I Hamilton’s principle maximises potential energy?

AI Thread Summary
Hamilton's principle minimizes the difference between kinetic energy and potential energy, effectively maximizing potential energy when kinetic energy is fixed. In scenarios where kinetic energy or mass is negligible, the Lagrangian simplifies to the negative of potential energy. The discussion references Feynman's explanation in his lectures, particularly around Fig 19-6, to illustrate these concepts. The limit of kinetic energy approaching zero raises questions about the meaningfulness of maximizing potential energy in this context. Ultimately, the focus remains on finding the path where the integral of kinetic and potential energy is extreme.
sentai
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
Hamilton’s principle minimises kinetic energy minus potential energy, that is, with a fixed kinetic energy, Hamilton's principle maximises potential energy. What if we consider the limit that the kinetic energy or the mass/the inertia can be ignored then the lagrangian is solely the negative of potential energy. How to understand the potential energy needs to be maximised?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anuttarasammyak said:
Feynmann does a good explanation around Fig 19.3 in https://www.feynmanlectures.caltech.edu/II_19.html.
Thank you, however, I don't think he said anything about maximization of PE and its meaning?
 
Sorry, Fig 19-6 and its around explains it.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and sentai
anuttarasammyak said:
Sorry, Fig 19-6 and its around explains it.
Thanks for pointing it out. Then how should we understand the limit of KE->0, then min(L)=-max(PE)?
 
As Feynman stated we are looking for the path KE-PE integral on which should be extreme.
KE=0 takes place at the top of trajectory in Fig 19-6 but I do not think considering such "limit of KE->0" is meaningful.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
I know that mass does not affect the acceleration in a simple pendulum undergoing SHM, but how does the mass on the spring that makes up the elastic pendulum affect its acceleration? Certainly, there must be a change due to the displacement from equilibrium caused by each differing mass? I am talking about finding the acceleration at a specific time on each trial with different masses and comparing them. How would they compare and why?
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/

Similar threads

Back
Top