Hand tool boundary conditions - Forces determination

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around determining boundary conditions for a linear static analysis of a hand tool using Finite Element Analysis (FEA). Participants are exploring the forces acting on the tool, particularly focusing on the representation of forces exerted by a bolt on the jaws of a spanner.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks advice on determining the magnitude and direction of forces using force and moment equilibrium, questioning whether additional forces should be included to satisfy equilibrium.
  • Another participant suggests that the modeling of the spanner may be incorrect, indicating that the applied force should be downward rather than upward due to the design of the spanner and its interaction with a nut.
  • Questions arise regarding the equality of forces F1 and F2, with a request for clarification on how this equality was established and the determination of the distance d.
  • Concerns are raised about the accuracy of measurements and the implications of the center of rotation in the context of the forces being analyzed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the modeling of forces and the assumptions made regarding the tool's mechanics. There is no consensus on the correct approach to determining the boundary conditions or the forces involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of the drawing and the potential for inaccuracies in measurements, which may affect the analysis. The discussion highlights the need for clear definitions and assumptions in the modeling process.

LuigiL
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Determine the forces acting on the hand tool (magnitude & direction).
Relevant Equations
ΣF = 0, ΣM = 0
Hello,
I' m trying to make a linear static analysis (Finite Element Analysis) on the following hand tool. I want to determine the boundary conditions. In order to do that I have decided to use a force couple to represent the forces that a bolt exerts on the jaws of this spanner.
Despite using force and moment equilibrium, I' m not able to determine the magnitude and direction of the forces.
Should I include any other forces in order to satisfy the equilibrium (maybe a force R in the lower jaw)?

I would be grateful if you can give me some advice. Thank you.

## M_O = F_1 \cdot d, ~ \text{&} ~ F_1=F_2 ##
## \Sigma M_O = 0,~ 144.93 \cdot F_3-M_O = 0,~ M_O = 14493 ~N \cdot mm. ##

## \Sigma F_x = 0,~ F_{3x} - R_x=0,~ R_x = F_3 \cdot sin(14.31^\circ). ##
## \Sigma F_y = 0,~ F_{3y} - R_y=0,~ R_y = F_3 \cdot cos(14.31^\circ). ##
Attachment.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF.

I think you are modelling the spanner with the force 3 applied up when it should be down. The reason is that the offset head will tend to slide off a nut if used the way you show it here. That would change the hexagonal nut contact points into the diagonally opposite positions between the jaws, which puts them at more similar distances along the handle.

The offset head allows a hexagonal nut in a confined place, to be advanced in 30° steps, by repeatedly turning over the spanner when access is restricted. But it also allows the more secure orientation when working on a more exposed nut.

The two nut edges that contact the spanner jaws will be deformed by the pressure of the spanner until the area of the contact is sufficient to handle the force applied. When you model the hardened spanner jaws, it is the nut that will deform, not the spanner. Maybe you need to model the soft plastic nut between the hard jaws.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Lnewqban
Hi,

##M_O = F_1 \cdot d, ~ \text{&} ~ F_1=F_2##
How have you determined that those forces are equal ? And what do you use for ##d## ?

I take it the purple ##O## is the center of the nut ?

Then, if the purple ##O## is your center of rotation, shouldn't the 144.63 (144.93 ?) be smaller ?
Like the 137.97 + 4.69
Now it looks as if it is up to the point where ##F_1## acts

The drawing has a lot of measurements that are unexplained.

And how do you determine these to such an accuracy ?

##\ ##
 
BvU said:
Hi,

How have you determined that those forces are equal ? And what do you use for ##d## ?

I take it the purple ##O## is the center of the nut ?

Then, if the purple ##O## is your center of rotation, shouldn't the 144.63 (144.93 ?) be smaller ?
Like the 137.97 + 4.69
Now it looks as if it is up to the point where ##F_1## acts

The drawing has a lot of measurements that are unexplained.

And how do you determine these to such an accuracy ?

##\ ##
Hello,
I assumed that ##F_1=F_2##.
##d## is the unknown and I want to determine it.
Indeed ##O## is the center of the nut.

##144.93 = 137.97+\frac{13.91}{2}## is the perpendicular distance from point ##O## to point ##3## (Force ##F_3##).

I apologize for the complexity of my drawing. Measurements were taken from the software that I designed this hand tool (with some roundings).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
35K