Happy holidays,BenDecomposing tensor product of GL(2,C) representations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on decomposing the representation of GL(2,C) on C^2 ⊗ Sym^{N-2}(C^2) into irreducible representations (irreps). The Littlewood-Richardson rule is identified as a key method for this decomposition, yielding the result Sym^{N-1}(C^2) ⊕ S_{(N-2,1)}(C^2). Relevant references include the Wikipedia page on the Littlewood-Richardson rule and the Schur functor, along with a specific paper that provides a combinatorial description of the decomposition process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of GL(n,C) representations
  • Familiarity with tensor products in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of irreducible representations (irreps)
  • Basic concepts of partitions in combinatorics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Littlewood-Richardson rule in detail
  • Explore the Schur functor and its applications
  • Read the paper referenced in the discussion for combinatorial insights
  • Investigate further into the representation theory of GL(n,C)
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, theoretical physicists, and graduate students specializing in representation theory and algebraic structures, particularly those working with GL(n,C) representations and tensor products.

swallowtail
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi PF bloggers,
I'm trying to decompose a representation of [tex]GL(2,C)[/tex] on [tex]C^2\otimes Sym^{N-2}(C^2)[/tex] into IRREPS and I'm wondering if there's anything similar to Clebsh-Gordan coefficients which could assist one in this task?
Any good references one could point out?
Happy holidays!

P.S.: action is described as [tex]g(v\otimes w) := g(v)\otimes g(w)[/tex], and '[tex]Sym^{N-2}(C^2)[/tex] ' is thought as homogeneous polynomials of degree (N-2) in two variables.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

To decompose a tensor product of representations of GL(n,C) into a direct sum of irreps, use the Littlewood-Richardson rule:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Littlewood–Richardson_rule

In your case, C^2 is the standard representation represented by the partition (1), and Sym^{N-2}(C^2) is the representation represented by the partition (N-2), so the decomposition is

Sym^{N-1}(C^2) \oplus S_{(N-2,1)}(C^2)

where the second thing is the irrep corresponding to the partition (N-2,1). See this for one possible construction:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schur_functor
A more combinatorial description can be found in Section 2 of this paper:
http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.4666
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K