Hard Circuit simplification problem

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a circuit simplification problem using Thevenin's theorem. Participants express difficulty in eliminating variables related to load resistance and understanding the unique combination of Thevenin equivalent voltage and resistance. They discuss deriving equations for voltage across the load and the relationships between various circuit components. The conversation emphasizes the challenge of manipulating equations with multiple unknowns to prove Thevenin's theorem. Overall, the focus is on clarifying the mathematical approach needed to solve the circuit problem effectively.
rohanlol7
Messages
66
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Everything is in the picture. Question 3(a)
This is for preparation for a contest.

FtiKaYw.png

http://i.imgur.com/FtiKaYw.jpg

Homework Equations


V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the total resistance of the first circuit and used that to evaluate V(AB). But this is in terms of the resistance of the load. I tried using kirchhoffs laws to eliminate it but i cannot seem to do so. Also i do not understand why there is a unique combination of R(th) and E(th) that works.
I also noticed that R(th) is in face the value of the resistance of the first circuit if the load has zero resistance but i don't understand why this is so
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Look at it from the point of view of the load. And post your work to see where you get stuck...
 
Look up Thevenin's theorem. Eth is the Thevenin equivalent voltage and and rth is the Thevenin resistance.
 
cnh1995 said:
Look up Thevenin's theorem. Eth is the Thevenin equivalent voltage and and rth is the Thevenin resistance.
Thanks ! i saw it. However i still don't understand how I'm supposed to figure that out in the problem
 
rohanlol7 said:
how I'm supposed to figure that out in the problem
You have two equations (already filling in ##\ \ V_{AB} = V_{PG} = V_L \ \ ## and ##\ \ I=I_0={V_L\over R_L}\ ##) : $$
V_L = V_{th}\; {r_{th} \over r_{th} + R_L}$$ in the right diagram; and in the left diagram you have $$
V_1 \; {R_3 \over R_1 + R_3} = V_L + R_2 {V_L \over R_L} $$and your task was to work around these two equations with four unknowns to two relationships by eliminating ##V_L## and ## R_L##. Not so easy, I grant you. But thereby you prove Thevenin's theorem (as opposed to making use of it)
 
BvU said:
You have two equations (already filling in ##\ \ V_{AB} = V_{PG} = V_L \ \ ## and ##\ \ I=I_0={V_L\over R_L}\ ##) : $$
V_L = V_{th}\; {r_{th} \over r_{th} + R_L}$$ in the right diagram; and in the left diagram you have $$
V_1 \; {R_3 \over R_1 + R_3} = V_L + R_2 {V_L \over R_L} $$and your task was to work around these two equations with four unknowns to two relationships by eliminating ##V_L## and ## R_L##. Not so easy, I grant you. But thereby you prove Thevenin's theorem (as opposed to making use of it)
Thanks ! i tried something similar.
The second equation come from equating the pd across R3 right ?
 
Across R3 and across the series Rload and R2 as well
 
BvU said:
Across R3 and across the series Rload and R2 as well
The right hand side of the equation represents the pd across the load and R2( right ? ) shouldn't the left hand side be v1- v1*R1/(total resistance for the circuit) ?
 
My bad ! Sorry. Well observed !
 
  • #10
BvU said:
My bad ! Sorry. Well observed !
No problem!
God so i knew how to do it its just the maths part that's killing me. I guess i'll have to work that out slowly. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
823
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
995
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K