Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the nature of difficult interview questions in STEM fields, particularly in engineering and computer science. Participants share their experiences and seek specific examples of challenging questions that require analytical thinking rather than rote memorization. The conversation explores the purpose of these questions and the skills they aim to assess.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- Monte expresses interest in difficult STEM interview questions that require precise answers, rather than general or soft questions.
- Some participants suggest that interviewers may change questions to assess a candidate's depth of knowledge and ability to think critically.
- Specific interview questions are shared, including those about mobile phone calls, bike dynamics, and the implications of hydrogen-powered cars on sea levels.
- There is a discussion about the importance of demonstrating understanding and problem-solving skills rather than simply providing correct answers.
- Bill shares insights from his experience as an interviewer, emphasizing the significance of methodology and management in project success, and how interview questions reflect this understanding.
- Some participants argue that the ability to think critically and apply knowledge is more valuable than the amount of knowledge itself.
- There are differing views on the effectiveness of current educational programs in preparing graduates for real-world problem-solving in interviews.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to interview questions or the effectiveness of educational programs. Multiple competing views are presented regarding the skills that interviews aim to assess and the nature of the questions asked.
Contextual Notes
Some claims about the hydrogen economy and its implications for sea levels depend on specific assumptions about energy sources and environmental impacts, which remain unresolved in the discussion.
Who May Find This Useful
Individuals preparing for STEM interviews, educators interested in interview techniques, and professionals in engineering and computer science may find this discussion relevant.