Harmonic oscillator in 2D - applying operators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of creation and annihilation operators in the context of a two-dimensional harmonic oscillator. Participants are analyzing a specific calculation involving inner products of quantum states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to simplify expressions involving operators and quantum states, questioning the steps taken to arrive at certain results. There is a focus on understanding how to apply operators to specific states and the implications of those applications.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring various interpretations of the operator applications. Some guidance has been provided regarding the nature of the operators and the resulting states, but there is no explicit consensus on the simplifications being discussed.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the application of annihilation operators and the resulting states, as well as the orthogonality of eigenstates in the harmonic oscillator framework.

Dassinia
Messages
141
Reaction score
0
Hello, I juste don't know how this was done it is on the solutionnary of a very long exercise and i am not getting this calculation

1. Homework Statement


<1,0| ax+ay++ax+ay+axay++axay|0,1> = <1,0|1,0>

Homework Equations


3. The Attempt at a Solution
We have that |0,1> = ay+ |0,0>
I don't understand how they did the simplification to get to the <1,0|1,0>, i am missing something
Thanks [/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you figure out what
(ax+ay++ax+ay+axay++axay)|0,1>
is?

(Hint: try it term by term.)
 
ax+ay+|1,0 > =ax+ay+ay+|0,0 >
ax+ay|1,0 >=ax+ayay+|0,0 >
axay+|1,0 >=axay+ay+|0,0 >
axay|1,0 >=axayay+|0,0 >

But then I don't know how to simplify all that
 
You're going backwards: reduce the number of operators. The same way that ay+|0,0 > = |0,1 >, what is ay|1,0 > ?
 
I am so confused, are you saying that I should not replace |1,0> by ay+| 0 0 > ?
ay|1,0 > = 0 ?
 
Dassinia said:
I am so confused, are you saying that I should not replace |1,0> by ay+| 0 0 > ?
Indeed. The final expression, <1,0|1,0> has no more operators. What you need to do is to apply the operators successively to get the resulting state vector (ket).

Dassinia said:
ay|1,0 > = |1,0> ?
That's not correct. You need to revise creation and annihilation operators.
 
I edited my answer
ay|1,0> = sqrt(0)|1, 0-1> = 0
 
Dassinia said:
I edited my answer
ay|1,0> = sqrt(0)|1, 0-1> = 0
I don't like the intermediate step, as there is no such thing as |1, -1>. The result is simply ay|1,0> = 0.

So now go back to my question in post #2.
 
ax+ay++ax+ay+axay++axay|0,1> = ax+ay++axay+|1,0>
ax+ay+|1,0>=|2,1>
axay+|1,0>=|0,1>
 
  • #10
There is a mistake somewhere it is
ax+ay+|0,1>=|1,2>
axay+|0,1>=0

So I get to |1,2> and not |1,0>
 
  • #11
Oh my god I have to see this again I applied ay to |1,0> and not |0,1> so i canceled them
I am left with

<1,0|1,2>=0 but why ? and <1,0|1,0>=1
 
  • #12
Dassinia said:
I am left with
<1,0|1,2>=0 but why ?
Because eigenstates of the harmonic oscillator are orthogonal. It is the y part, <0|2>, that is zero.

Dassinia said:
and <1,0|1,0>=1
For normalized states, yes.
 
  • #13
Thank you very much !
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K