Harmonic oscillator positive position expectation value?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the position expectation value for a harmonic oscillator in a superposition state \(\psi = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle + |1\rangle)\). The calculated expectation value of position is \(\langle X \rangle = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}\), which raises questions about the symmetry of the harmonic oscillator potential. The positive expectation value arises from the superposition of energy eigenstates with different parity, indicating that the state is not an energy eigenstate and does not violate the Hamiltonian's symmetry. Furthermore, the expectation value evolves over time, exhibiting oscillatory behavior.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals, specifically harmonic oscillators
  • Understanding of quantum state superposition
  • Familiarity with creation and annihilation operators
  • Knowledge of expectation values in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quantum superposition in more detail
  • Learn about the time evolution of quantum states using the Schrödinger equation
  • Explore the implications of parity in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of expectation values in quantum harmonic oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists studying harmonic oscillators, and anyone interested in the implications of superposition in quantum systems.

guitarphysics
Messages
241
Reaction score
7
So this is something that troubled me a bit- in Shankar's PQM, there's an exercise that asks you to find the position expectation value for the harmonic oscillator in a state \psi such that
\psi=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|0\rangle+|1\rangle)
Where |n\rangle is the n^{th} energy eigenstate of the oscillator.

Now, I calculated the expectation value of position in the following way:
\langle X \rangle=\langle \psi| X|\psi\rangle=\frac{1}{2}((\langle 0|+\langle 1|)\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}(a+a^{\dagger})(|0\rangle+|1\rangle))

Where a and a^{\dagger} are the annihilation and creation operators, respectively. Using the properties of these operators, we quickly get to

\langle X \rangle=\sqrt{\frac{\hbar}{2m\omega}}

(I also did it another slightly more complicated way, where I integrated in the position representation; this gave me the same result.)

Now, what bothers me about this whole thing is the following:

We know that the state is in a superposition of two positive energy eigenstates. Additionally, the expectation value of position for an energy eigenstate will be zero. Why is it that this superposition of eigenstates, this interference, brings out a positive expectation value for position? What kills me about this most is the fact that the expectation value is positive. This seems to do away with the apparent symmetry in the problem; why should the particle in a harmonic oscillator potential choose to be more at the "right" side? Why couldn't the expectation value be \pm the above value? Or, even better, just zero?

So essentially there's two questions here:
1) why does the superposition of energy eigenstates here lead to a nonzero position expectation value? And,
2) why is this value positive? Doesn't this violate the symmetry in the harmonic oscillator potential?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
guitarphysics said:
1) why does the superposition of energy eigenstates here lead to a nonzero position expectation value? And,
Because the components of the superposition correspond to different parity signs. The ground state has even parity while the first excited state has the odd one.
guitarphysics said:
2) why is this value positive? Doesn't this violate the symmetry in the harmonic oscillator potential?
The superposition state you have there is not an energy eigenstate, therefore, its non-symmetric nature does not violate the Hamiltonian.
guitarphysics said:
why should the particle in a harmonic oscillator potential choose to be more at the "right" side? Why couldn't the expectation value be ±±\pm the above value?
The expectation value you have calculated is that at ##t=0##. If you let the system evolve in time, the expectation value of position will be a function of time. In particular, it will show some oscillatory motion between two fixed positions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nugatory and guitarphysics
Cool, thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K