Has Anyone Ever Owned/Played DVD9s?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kyphysics
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Most DVDs are DVD5s, which are single-layer discs, while DVD9s are less common and feature a double-layer format. There is uncertainty regarding whether DVD9s will play on standard DVD players, with conflicting information available online. Generally, if a DVD player supports DVD-2 or DVD-3 formats, it should also be able to read DVD-9s, but compatibility can depend on the age of the player and its specifications. It's important to check the player's compatibility with dual-layer DVDs. Additionally, region encoding may affect playback, as different regions (e.g., Region 1 for the US and Region 2 for Japan) can restrict the ability to play foreign DVDs.
kyphysics
Messages
684
Reaction score
445
Most DVDs are DVD5s. Some - less common are DVD9s.

I'm thinking of buying foreign language film that is a DVD9, but am not sure if it'd play on a normal DVD player.

I've seen conflicting answers online. Some say they can always be played on regular DVD players, while others say you have to put in in our computer drive to play it...

Figured people here were more reputable and I could get a closer-to-truth answer. Thanks in advance!
 
Computer science news on Phys.org
The difference is in the number of layers on the DVD. Single layer is lower cost, used by DVD-5, while double layer is used by DVD-9.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DVD#Capacity

I expect if your drive can handle DVD-2 or 3 it should be able to read DVD-9.
But there is always the question of how old is your DVD player, and what formats does it support. Look up the player specifications on the web.
 
I thought that dual layer DVDs were part of the format from the start and everything was required to play them. My PS2 had no problems with Dual layer DVD+R that held 8.5 GB

Perhaps you are thinking of region encoding? That is a different subject entirely. The US is region 1 and Japan is 2, I think? Region 5 would be Africa.
 
LLMs and AIs have a bad reputation at PF, and I share this opinion. I have seen too much nonsense they produced, and too many "independent researchers" who weren't so independent after all, since they used them. And then there is a simple question: If we had to check their results anyway, why would we use them in the first place? In fact, their use is forbidden by the rules. I tend to interpret the reason for this rule because nobody wants to talk to a machine via PF. Those who want to can...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
294
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
15K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
5K