Having trouble evaluating an integral

  • Thread starter Thread starter mcah5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on evaluating a complex integral related to the triangle waveform using Mathematica. The integral in question is defined as Integrate[ 1/w^2 * (1-Cos[T*w/2]) * Exp[(1-n)*I*t*w ] with respect to w from -Infinity to Infinity. While Mathematica struggles with this integral, the user finds success using InverseFourierTransform for specific integer values of n. The conversation also touches on residue calculus, noting that the only singularity identified is at w = 0, which yields a zero residue. Ultimately, the user realizes that the task is to find the Fourier transform of the function rather than the integral itself.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier transforms and their applications
  • Familiarity with complex analysis, particularly residue theory
  • Proficiency in using Mathematica for symbolic computation
  • Knowledge of trigonometric identities and their application in integrals
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of InverseFourierTransform in Mathematica
  • Explore residue calculus in complex analysis
  • Learn about the Fourier transform of piecewise functions, specifically triangle waveforms
  • Review trigonometric identities and their use in simplifying integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with Fourier analysis, particularly those dealing with complex integrals and waveform analysis.

mcah5
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to find a series expression for the triangle waveform through some messy math.

I've reduced the problem down to solving the integral:

Integrate[ 1/w^2 * (1-Cos[T*w/2]) * Exp[(1-n)*I*t*w ] with respect to w from -Infinity to Infinity

T is a constant, I is Sqrt[-1], and n is an integer.

Mathematica cannot evaluate this integral, but if I use the function InverseFourierTransform and substitute a specific value of n, mathematica works. I plotted for a couple of n's and I know this is the integral I want.

I tried doing the integral through residues, but the only singularity I can see is w = 0 and the residue there is zero.

The problem is Ex. #5 part d of http://www.hep.caltech.edu/~fcp/math/distributions/distributions.pdf (scroll all the way down to the bottom)

Is there some residue I'm not seeing?

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why not simply expand the exp(i[...]) in sin and cos and separate the integral in real and imaginary part and integrate them separately.

Pehaps use the cosAcosB and CosASinB identities on the resulting integrals.
 
Actually, I just re-read the question. It asks that I find the Fourier transform of f, not f itself so I don't need to do this integral :o

Now I feel stupid. I'll try that method though, thanks :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K