Having trouble with Helmholtz Coil Experiment Calculations

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
Darthturkey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Number of wraps of coil on magnetic moment in field: 100 - N_c
Number of wraps of coil on Helmholtz coil: 140 - N_h
Current through magnetic moment: .796A - I_c
Area of magnetic moment: .37m - A_c
Radius of Helmholtz coil: .1635m - R_h
Current through Helmholtz coil to attain equilibrium on balance: 1.32, 2.61,3.91 corresponding to gravitational torques caused by counterweights that are .255m away, .0001g,.0002g,.0003g


Homework Equations


Bh=(8u_0*N_h*I_h)/(5^(3/2) * R_h)
as well as T_m = B_h * N_c*I*A_c

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the three torques both gravitational as well as magnetic based on the formulas provided above. Each time I received an answer that was a magnitude of 100 apart. Based on my thinking the T_g and T_m should be equal as the magnetic torque should balance out the gravitational torque. I have checked to make sure all of my units are in SI and I still cannot determine why I am not getting the calculations that I should. I also cannot make heads or tails of how the Area of the magnetic moment within the field should have a vector and if it does, how to describe its orientation in space.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you get "exactly" 100 as factor between the answers? This would hint to some conversion errors, or a missing factor of N_c somewhere.
If the factor is 125, the factor of 5^(3/2) is in the wrong part of the fraction.
Can you show your calculations? I don't see an obvious error here. I think the prefactor 8/(5^(3/2)) is given somewhere?

A notation like "100 - N_c" is confusing, this looks like a subtraction. Why don't you write 100 = N_c, or (better) N_c = 100?