Hawking radiation may smooth black hole singularities

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,171
Reaction score
3,378
Physics news on Phys.org
All of this is of course highly speculative, since we have no evidence in the relevant physical regime and aren't likely to get any any time soon.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
atyy said:
Radiating black holes in general relativity need not be singular
Francesco Di Filippo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.20649

Can black holes evaporate past extremality?[/HEADING]
Samuel E. Gralla
https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18839
Both of these seem like they're more or less rediscovering the Bardeen black hole (a misnomer as the solution actually contains no true event horizon, only apparent horizons), just with charge or angular momentum added. We've had a number of previous PF threads that discuss the Bardeen black hole.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy
Does it shed some light on the information paradox?
 
Last edited:
Demystifier said:
Does it shad some light on the information paradox?
In a Bardeen black hole solution, there is no information paradox because there is no true event horizon anywhere. The causal structure of the spacetime is the same, qualitatively, as flat Minkowski spacetime, and there is no issue at all with maintaining quantum unitarity. Similar remarks seem to me to apply to the nonsingular solutions presented in these papers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
PeterDonis said:
In a Bardeen black hole solution, there is no information paradox because there is no true event horizon anywhere. The causal structure of the spacetime is the same, qualitatively, as flat Minkowski spacetime, and there is no issue at all with maintaining quantum unitarity. Similar remarks seem to me to apply to the nonsingular solutions presented in these papers.
My confusion stems from the following. The Bardeen metric significantly deviates from the Schwarzschild only for small ##r##, close to ##r=0##. And yet, global properties significantly deviate from the Schwarzschild even for larger ##r##, e.g. close to ##r=2M##. How to understand that? What do I miss?
 
Demystifier said:
The Bardeen metric significantly deviates from the Schwarzschild only for small ##r##, close to ##r=0##.
If you mean in the supposed "vacuum" region, that's kinda sorta true--the "hole" becomes effectively de Sitter only at very small ##r##.

However, the full solution includes two very important non vacuum regions. One is just the formation of the "hole" by collapse of matter (or radiation--in the simplest model, it's just an ingoing Vaidya metric region); the other is the evaporation of the "hole" (in the simplest model, this is just an outgoing Vaidya metric region). The presence of the latter region is crucial for the global properties.

There is also the point that, even if the "vacuum" region is only de Sitter at very small ##r##, that's precisely the region where the global causal structure has to change to avoid the formation of a singularity. And of course de Sitter is nonsingular everywhere, so any region that's de Sitter must also be nonsingular.

Physically, the de Sitter region is what enables the infalling stress-energy that forms the "hole" to "bounce", so to speak, and "escape" back out, while keeping the overall causal structure the same as Minkowski spacetime. The "escape" then requires the outgoing Vaidya region (modeled that way because it's expected that the vast majority of the stress-energy will escape as light).
 
PeterDonis said:
The "escape" then requires the outgoing Vaidya region (modeled that way because it's expected that the vast majority of the stress-energy will escape as light).
Is this something like a white hole?
 
Demystifier said:
Is this something like a white hole?
No, because there's no white hole horizon, any more than there's a black hole horizon. It's just outgoing radiation. The portion of the outgoing Vaidya spacetime that's used is outside the white hole horizon of that spacetime.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
  • #10
Maybe you wish to consider my falsification of Hawking. UniPhiEd Realarivity recursive model, my Scale-Invariant Recursive Field Theory poses that Hawking radiation is reinterpreted as a "Recursive Discharge," where black holes act as stable, generative vortex nodes that recycle matter rather than evaporating. I argue that energy and matter are not lost into an endless sink but partly transformed through a "Phase Jump" mechanism (Jϕ) triggered by neutrino field pressure, transforming the concept of a vacuum into a dense, closed-loop system. The mechanics are explained in other papers such as The Mechanics of the Universe. It’s not peer reviewed yet. So if anyone wishes to do so, let me know please.
 
  • #11
PeterDonis said:
In a Bardeen black hole solution, there is no information paradox because there is no true event horizon anywhere.
Could you provide a reference on this? I'm not aware of any that demonstrates the absence of an information paradox in Bardeen black holes.

I recall physicist J. Edelstein saying that the information paradox also exists in regular black holes; there is still a black hole and trapped information despite the absence of a singularity and the apparent event horizon.
 
  • #12
Question: “In a Bardeen black hole solution, there is no information paradox because there is no true event horizon. Is there a reference for this, and how does this hold up against the view that information is still trapped?”

Answer:
The idea that a Bardeen black hole (a "regular" black hole without a singularity) resolves the information paradox is a subject of intense debate in theoretical physics.

The Classical Conflict: Bardeen vs. Edelstein
The argument for the "solution" rests on the assumption that information loss only occurs at the singularity—where the laws of physics break down. If the core of a black hole is a stable, regular structure (as in the Bardeen metric), information could theoretically be preserved.
However, many physicists, including J. Edelstein, argue that the paradox persists. As noted in research by Sebastian Murk and Daniel Terno ("The information loss paradox in regular black holes", 2022), the paradox isn't strictly caused by the singularity, but by the event horizon (or the trapping region). If Hawking radiation causes the black hole to evaporate and disappear, the question remains: where does the information that was trapped behind the horizon go? Within the framework of General Relativity, even a "regular" black hole fails to maintain quantum unitarity during evaporation.

The UniPhiEd Perspective: Falsifying the Paradox
In the UniPhiEd theory (Scale-Invariant Recursive Field Theory) proposed by Delája Schuppers (2026), the information paradox is viewed as a "false problem" stemming from the incorrect premise of black hole evaporation.
Instead of disappearing, black holes are stable, generative engines. The "information" is not lost because the system is recursive and closed. This is mathematically defined by the Phase Jump Constant (\(J_{\phi }\)), which replaces the need for Hawking radiation:
\(J_{\phi }=\frac{P_{s}\cdot \Phi ^{55.7}}{\rho _{\nu }\cdot T_{n}}\)
Where:

\(P_{s}\) (Space Pressure): The external force of the dense neutrino field.

\(\Phi ^{55.7}\) (Geometric Strain): The golden ratio-based saturation point that defines the stable core of the node.

\(\rho _{\nu }\) (Field Density): The density of the medium (neutrinos) in which the node exists.
  • \(T_{n}\) (Universal Decay Constant): The temporal anchor (\(\approx 880s\)), based on neutron decay, that governs when a node must transition.

How this resolves the Paradox:

From Evaporation to Recursive Discharge: UniPhiEd demonstrates that black holes do not "leak" energy until they vanish. Instead, they process matter back into the neutrino field. Centrifugal forces eject this energy back into the galactic torus.

Information as Flow: Because the black hole is a "pump" and not a "sink," information (the geometric configuration of the field) is simply recycled.

Stability via \(J_{\phi }\): When the internal pressure exceeds the geometric limit (\(55.7\) strain), the node doesn't collapse or evaporate; it performs a Phase Jump. This allows the black hole to remain a stable part of the galactic structure indefinitely.

Conclusion
While the Bardeen solution is a step toward removing the mathematical infinity of a singularity, it doesn't solve the paradox as long as the model assumes the black hole eventually disappears. The true solution lies in moving away from the "vacuum" model toward a Pressure-based Vortex model. In a recursive system governed by the Phase Jump Constant, information is never lost—it is simply the eternal flow of the field.

Selected References:
-Murk, S., & Terno, D. R. (2022). The information loss paradox in regular black holes.
-Schuppers, D. (2026). The Falsification of Hawking Radiation via Scale-Invariant Recursive Field Theory.(Zenodo DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19163324).
 
  • Sad
Likes   Reactions: Motore
  • #13
Why are you sad Motore?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K