Hearing Back from Physics REUs: My Experience

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around participants sharing their experiences and updates regarding applications to Research Experiences for Undergraduates (REUs) in physics and related fields. The scope includes personal anecdotes about acceptance and rejection notifications, timelines for responses, and the emotional impact of the application process.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express anxiety over not hearing back from REUs they applied to, with one noting they applied to several schools without any responses yet.
  • Others share their acceptance experiences, with one participant mentioning they received an acceptance email from George Washington University and another from the University of Toledo.
  • There are questions about the methods of communication for acceptance or rejection, with a consensus that emails are commonly used.
  • Some participants discuss the timeline for responses, indicating that many programs may take weeks to review applications and notify applicants.
  • Concerns are raised about the pressure of making quick decisions on offers, especially when waiting for responses from other programs.
  • Several participants report rejections from various programs, expressing disappointment and sharing their academic backgrounds, including GPA and prior research experience.
  • One participant mentions being on a short list for a program pending funding finalization, highlighting uncertainty in the acceptance process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally share similar experiences regarding the uncertainty and anxiety of waiting for REU responses, but there is no consensus on the best strategies for managing applications or the timing of notifications.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that their academic standing (e.g., being a sophomore or having prior research experience) may influence their chances of acceptance, indicating a variety of factors at play in the application outcomes.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering applying to REUs, particularly in physics and related fields, may find this discussion relevant as it reflects the common experiences and challenges faced during the application process.

  • #31
Most of the sites mention that the program is dependent on funding from the NSF.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
ehrenfest said:
How is it ethical are even legal to "accept" hundreds of time-consuming applications for a research program that has not even been funded. Don't you think they should warn the applicants that their funding is not secure or something? I would be really annoyed if I find out I applied to an REU that is not happening this summer.

The applications are free. Also, they may not find out soon enough, so it'd be easier for them to just assume they were funded.
 
  • #33
I too have not heard back from 2 REUs yet. At this point though I am pretty much accepting it as a denial, since many of those programs start within weeks.
 
  • #34
If you haven't heard back in a timely fashion, you should ask about your status. Many REUs don't bother to send out rejections.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
11K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
632
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 119 ·
4
Replies
119
Views
17K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K