MHB Heat Capacity: Mixing 100g Water @2C & 50g Ice @-4C

Raerin
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
If 100g of water at 2 degrees Celsius is mixed with 50g of ice a -4 degrees Celsius, what is the final temperature of water? It also says that I need the heat of fusion of the ice to solve it, which I have found to be 334 kj/kg. I don't know what to do with the heat of fusion. Also, how do I convert 344 kj/kg to j/g? Is it still 334?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Raerin said:
how do I convert 344 kj/kg to j/g? Is it still 334?
Yes.

Raerin said:
If 100g of water at 2 degrees Celsius is mixed with 50g of ice a -4 degrees Celsius, what is the final temperature of water? It also says that I need the heat of fusion of the ice to solve it, which I have found to be 334 kj/kg. I don't know what to do with the heat of fusion.
There are four options:

(1) all ice will melt
(2) some ice will melt
(3) some water will freeze
(4) all water will freeze

In cases (2) and (3) the resulting temperature of the mixture is 0 degrees Celsius.

Consider the following energies.

$Q_1$ heats 50g of ice from -4°C to 0°C.

$Q_2$ melts 50g of ice at 0°C.

$Q_3$ melts 100g of ice at 0°C, or is produced when 100g of water freezes.

$Q_4$ heats 100g of water from 0°C to 2°C, or is produces when 100g of water cools from 2°C to 0°C.

Then the options above take place under the following conditions.

(1) $Q_1+Q_2<Q_4$
(2) $Q_1<Q_4<Q_1+Q_2$
(3) $Q_4<Q_1<Q_4+Q_3$
(4) $Q_3+Q_4<Q_1$

$Q_2$ and $Q_3$ are found by multiplying heat of fusion by mass.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top