Heat exchanger capacity (condenser and evaporator)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the capacity of heat exchangers, specifically in the context of window-type air conditioning systems. Participants explore various methods to calculate heat transfer, considering both refrigerant and air flow, and the implications of different assumptions in their calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose using the equation involving mass flow rate of the refrigerant, specific heat, and temperature change to calculate heat transfer.
  • Others argue that the analysis should focus on the refrigerant rather than the air for more accurate data, suggesting the use of enthalpy changes instead.
  • A participant notes that for dry air, specific heat times delta-T times mass flow can be used, but for moist air, additional considerations for condensed water are necessary.
  • One participant questions the applicability of the psychrometric chart at 100 kPa when air is blown through a fan, inquiring about the impact of fan-induced pressure changes.
  • Another participant confirms that while air pressure does increase when blown through a fan, the increase is typically minimal, around 1 kPa.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriate methods for calculating heat transfer in heat exchangers, with no consensus reached on the best approach. There is also a lack of agreement on the relevance of using the psychrometric chart under certain conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations regarding the assumptions made in their calculations, such as the behavior of refrigerants in two-phase flow and the conditions of the air (dry vs. moist). The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of pressure changes in air due to fan operation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in HVAC systems, thermodynamics, and experimental methods in heat transfer analysis.

plucker_08
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Window-type Aircon

how to get this in an actual experiment?

is it just (mass flow rate of the refrigerant X specific heat X Change in temp of the refrigerant)

or (mass flow rate of the air passing thru the heat exchanger X specific heat X Change in temp of the air)

or (mass flow rate of the refrigerant X change in enthalpy (outlet and inlet state of the refrigerant)

or (mass flow rate of the air X Change in enthalpy of the air)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
First, think about what control volume you are doing the analysis on. Are you measuring the air or the refrigerant? Under ideal situations, the heat absorbed by the refrigerant is the same as the heat rejected in the room. But practically, you are much more likely to get good data measuring changes in the refrigerant.

This eliminates your second and fourth equations.

Your first equation assumes that the refrigerant is a perfect gas but because in a traditional vapor-compression refrigeration cycle the flow through a heat exchanger is typically two-phase this is a bad assumption, hence this equation does not apply.

Your third equation will allow you to properly calculate the amount of heat absorbed.
 
The first response is fine, but just a quick fyi - if the air is dry, you can use the specific heat times delta-T times mass flow for the air, but if it is moist, you'll need to add the specific heat and mass flow of condensed water. But just using enthalpy instead covers that.

Btw, there is a recent thread about a window heat pump unit where I do this exact experiment. I'm trying to get a paper published.
 
can i use the pyschrometric chart for 100KPa, even if the air is blown thru fan?

the air pressure increases when blown by fan, right?
 
Yes, air pressure increases when blown through a fan, but not by much. A powerful air conditioning fan might give you 1kPa of pressure rise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
15K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K