Heating Torch Using a Fuel That Does Not Contain Carbon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a suitable fuel for a torch that can heat an experiment to temperatures between 500-1200°C without introducing carbon or hydrogen contamination. Participants explore various fuel options, alternative heating methods, and the implications of using different gases.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using silane (SiH4) as a potential torch fuel but expresses uncertainty about its viability and the byproducts it may produce.
  • Another participant proposes nitrogen-based fuels like ammonia, questioning their toxicity and potential effects on the experiment.
  • A participant raises concerns about the use of hydrogen-containing fuels due to contamination risks and suggests exploring electrical heating methods instead.
  • Some participants discuss the possibility of using hot gases such as air, nitrogen, or argon under pressure as an alternative heating method, with considerations about chemical stability at high temperatures.
  • There is mention of gas mixtures used in atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) that achieve high flame temperatures, though concerns about carbon and hydrogen content are noted.
  • One participant recalls a welding process involving atomic hydrogen and wonders if a similar approach could be applied to nitrogen.
  • Suggestions for non-contact heating methods, such as using a hollow ellipsoidal reflector with a halogen globe, are also presented.
  • A reference to a book titled "Ignition" is made, which is said to contain information on non-carbon, non-hydrogen propellants.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of ideas and concerns regarding potential fuels and heating methods, with no consensus reached on a specific solution. Multiple competing views on the best approach remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to contamination from combustion products, the stability of gases at high temperatures, and the specific requirements of the experiment, which may affect the choice of heating method.

mybrotherdarre
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a fuel for a torch to heat an experiment to 500-1200C. We do not want to introduce exterior sources of Carbon. H2 cannot be used as a fuel because excess H2 will also throw off the results. My professor suggested SiH4, but I cannot find any information on silane as a torch fuel. Anybody have any ideas?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Something nitrogen-based? Ammonia (+catalyst), maybe even with nitrogen dioxide to provide oxygen?
No idea if the temperature is sufficient. And it is toxic.

Are other heating methods (without combustion) an option?
 
We aren't using Nitrogen anymore for the carrier gas because it messes with the GC, I guess, so I don't know if the ammonia will affect things too much or not - but I'll bring it up. Thank you for the suggestion!

I am trying to find alternate heating methods to present as well as an optional torch fuel. The alternate heating methods seem to be easier to find, and I am having a ton of trouble finding fuels that fit the bill. Does anyone know anything about burning SiH4? Does it create a lot of SiO2? Will the buildup be a problem for the equipment and sensors?
 
Well, if you can't use H2 because of the potential for hydrogen contamination of your experiment, then perhaps SiH4 or ammonia isn't the way to go either, since both contain hydrogen.

Why does your heating source have to be a torch anyway? If you are worried about contamination, it seems like some sort of electrical heater or furnace would be the way to go.

If you don't want to introduce carbon contamination, have you sealed your experiment? After all, air has CO2 in it.
 
I like SteamKing's idea. Instead of actually burning a fuel and using the combustion products, could you use a very hot gas such as air, nitrogen or argon and propel it under pressure? Another option might be superheated steam. You would heat the gas or steam to the temperature you want under pressure and use a valve and nozzle to direct the gas where you want it. Heat could come from any energy source such as an electric or hydrocarbon fuel source.
 
Is superheated steam or nitrogen even chemically stable at 1200C ?
The hot gas concept seems very promising otherwise, but it would probably be best to use an inert gas such as Argon or Neon.
 
Nitrogen is fine, and cheaper than argon or neon.
If hot oxygen is not an issue, you can even use air.
 
That's not exactly what you are asking for, but there are several known gas mixtures that give a high flame temperature used for AAS, see an example list here.

Perhaps the list will give you some new ideas.
 
The OP was concerned about possible contamination of his experiment by carbon and hydrogen. Most of the fuels on the AAS list are composed of carbon or hydrogen, or both. IMO, a non-combustible source of heat would eliminate contamination of the experiment.
 
  • #10
Sure. But knowing where such mixtures are used means another keywords to look for, doesn't it?
 
  • #11
that reminds me...

I recall learning, years ago, about a welding process called "atomic hydrogen". I think the idea was, send H2 through an arc, which heated it up and in the process dissociated it. Not only was it hot, but also had a large 'latent heat' of recombination, producing very high temperatures. I wuz wundering -- could N2 be dissociated the same way?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_hydrogen_welding
 
  • #12
Consider using a hollow ellipsoidal reflector with a halogen globe at one focus and the item to be heated at the other. Non-contact and adjustable to over 3000K.
 
  • #13
Try the book "Ignition" by John Clark.

Lot's of non C non H propellents there I recall. But they are nasty, toxic, unstable beasts.

Chemistries based on N / F / Cl / B / Si abound...
 
  • #14
What is the material - does it have to be a torch? OR as suggested a superheated inert gas -
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
17K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K