Heaviside step function, signal and systems

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the analysis of the discrete time signal defined as x[n] = u[n] - u[n-6], where u[n] represents the Heaviside step function. The user successfully derived the even part of the signal, x', using the formula x' = 1/2(x[n] + x[-n]). The user determined that the even part is zero for n values not equal to 0 or 6, and confirmed that the even part equals 1 at n = 0 and -1 at n = 6. The reasoning was validated by other forum members, affirming the user's understanding of the concepts involved.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heaviside step function (u[n])
  • Knowledge of discrete time signals and their properties
  • Familiarity with even and odd signal decomposition
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the Heaviside step function in depth
  • Learn about signal decomposition techniques for discrete signals
  • Explore the concept of even and odd functions in signal processing
  • Investigate applications of discrete time signals in systems analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in electrical engineering, particularly those focusing on signal processing and systems analysis, will benefit from this discussion.

Jncik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


given this discrete time signal

x[n] = u[n] - u[n-6]

find for which n the even part of x is 0

The Attempt at a Solution



the even part is

x' = 1/2(x[n] + x[-n]) = 1/2(u[n] - u[n-6] + u[-n] - u[6-n])

now i find that

u[n] + u[-n] is 2 for n = 0 and 1 for n != 0
u[n-6] + u[6-n] is 2 for n = 6 and 1 for n!=6

let z[n] = u[n] + u[-n]
k[n] = u[n-6] + u[6-n]

we want to find where 1/2 * (z[n] - k[n]) = 0 => z[n] - k[n] = 0

this is
0 for n != 0 and n!=6
1 for n = 0
-1 for n = 6

is this correct? I am new to this thing.. if you can please help me :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your reasoning makes sense to me... is there some reason you suspect that your answer is wrong?
 
diazona said:
Your reasoning makes sense to me... is there some reason you suspect that your answer is wrong?

No not really, I just wasn't 100% sure for my answer, my book didnt really have any answers and i needed to know if i understood these simple concepts.. thanks for your help now I can move on :)
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K