Hecke Bound for Cusp - Modular Forms

  • Thread starter Thread starter binbagsss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Forms
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 1K views
binbagsss
Messages
1,291
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



i have a questions on the piece of lecture notes attached:

whatthehecke.png

2. Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]

I agree 2) of proposition 2.12 holds once we have 1). I thought I understood the general idea of 1), however, my reasoning would hold for ##M_k## it does not depend on ##f(t)## being a cusp and so it must be wrong. This was what I thought was happening:

##q=e^{2\pi i n (u+iv)} ~ e^{-v} ## for large v, and exponential dominates over ##v ^ {x}## ( v>0 as on upper plane )

This would ofc still hold if I included some constant term, I would still get the same quantity is bounded.

can someone please tel me where I have gone wrong with the above reasoning?

 

Attachments

  • whatthehecke.png
    whatthehecke.png
    30.7 KB · Views: 833
Physics news on Phys.org
binbagsss said:
##q=e^{2\pi i n (u+iv)} \approx e^{-v} ## for large v, and exponential dominates over ##v ^ {x}## ( v>0 as on upper plane )



edited apologies latex error