Heine-Borel Theorem & D&K Theorem 1.8.17 | Peter's Question

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Heine-Borel Theorem and Duistermaat and Kolk's Theorem 1.8.17, specifically addressing the proof regarding the openness of the set $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$. The participants confirm that the set $\{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \mid \| x - y \| < \frac{1}{j_0} \}$ represents an open ball around point $y$. They conclude that since every point in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ has an open ball contained within it, this implies that $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is open, as it can be expressed as a union of such open balls.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Heine-Borel Theorem
  • Familiarity with open sets in metric spaces
  • Knowledge of the concept of open balls in $\mathbb{R}^n$
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation and proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Heine-Borel Theorem in detail to understand its implications in real analysis.
  • Learn about open sets and their properties in metric spaces.
  • Explore the concept of continuity and its relation to open sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
  • Investigate other theorems related to topology in real analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers focusing on real analysis, particularly those studying continuity, topology, and the properties of open sets in $\mathbb{R}^n$.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation" by J. J. Duistermaat and J. A. C. Kolk ...

I am focused on Chapter 1: Continuity ... ...

I need help with another aspect of the proof of Theorem 1.8.17 ... ...

Duistermaat and Kolk's Theorem 1.8.17 and its proof (including the preceding relevant definition) read as follows:View attachment 7765
View attachment 7766
In the last line of the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... and so $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\text{\\} K$$. ... ... "Presumably $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} $$

... because $$\mid \mid y - y \mid \mid = \mid \mid 0 \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 }$$ ...

Is that right?

BUT ...

How/why does $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\text{\\}K$$ mean that $$\mathbb{R}^n\text{\\} K$$ is open?Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I
In the last line of the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... and so $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\text{\\} K$$. ... ... "Presumably $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} $$

... because $$\mid \mid y - y \mid \mid = \mid \mid 0 \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 }$$ ...

Is that right?

Yes, you are right. The set $\{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} $ is just the open ball of radius $\frac{1}{j_0}$ centered at $y$, so certainly $y$ is in it.

Peter said:
BUT ...

How/why does $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\text{\\}K$$ mean that $$\mathbb{R}^n\text{\\} K$$ is open?

We started with an arbitrary point $y \in \mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ and have now shown that there exists an open ball around $y$ that is entirely contained in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$.

So, each point of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is an interior point of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$. This means that $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is open.

Another way to say the same thing: $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ can be written as the union of open balls (choose an open ball for each such point $y$ as above and take the union of all such balls). Since any union (finite, infinite, doesn't matter) of open sets is open, this proves openness of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$.
 
Krylov said:
Yes, you are right. The set $\{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} $ is just the open ball of radius $\frac{1}{j_0}$ centered at $y$, so certainly $y$ is in it.
We started with an arbitrary point $y \in \mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ and have now shown that there exists an open ball around $y$ that is entirely contained in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$.

So, each point of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is an interior point of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$. This means that $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is open.

Another way to say the same thing: $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ can be written as the union of open balls (choose an open ball for each such point $y$ as above and take the union of all such balls). Since any union (finite, infinite, doesn't matter) of open sets is open, this proves openness of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$.
Thanks Krylov... your post was extremely helpful...

Appreciate your help and guidance...

Peter
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K