MHB Heine-Borel Theorem & D&K Theorem 1.8.17 | Peter's Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the proof of Theorem 1.8.17 from Duistermaat and Kolk's "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation," specifically regarding the openness of the set $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$. It clarifies that if a point $y$ is in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$, there exists an open ball around $y$ that is entirely contained in this set. This indicates that every point in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is an interior point, confirming that the set is open. The discussion emphasizes that the union of open balls around each point in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ further supports this conclusion. Overall, the proof demonstrates the relationship between the properties of open sets and the structure of the space in question.
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading "Multidimensional Real Analysis I: Differentiation" by J. J. Duistermaat and J. A. C. Kolk ...

I am focused on Chapter 1: Continuity ... ...

I need help with another aspect of the proof of Theorem 1.8.17 ... ...

Duistermaat and Kolk's Theorem 1.8.17 and its proof (including the preceding relevant definition) read as follows:View attachment 7765
View attachment 7766
In the last line of the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... and so $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\text{\\} K$$. ... ... "Presumably $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} $$

... because $$\mid \mid y - y \mid \mid = \mid \mid 0 \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 }$$ ...

Is that right?

BUT ...

How/why does $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\text{\\}K$$ mean that $$\mathbb{R}^n\text{\\} K$$ is open?Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Peter said:
I
In the last line of the above proof we read the following:

" ... ... and so $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\text{\\} K$$. ... ... "Presumably $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} $$

... because $$\mid \mid y - y \mid \mid = \mid \mid 0 \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 }$$ ...

Is that right?

Yes, you are right. The set $\{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} $ is just the open ball of radius $\frac{1}{j_0}$ centered at $y$, so certainly $y$ is in it.

Peter said:
BUT ...

How/why does $$y \in \{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} \subset \mathbb{R}^n\text{\\}K$$ mean that $$\mathbb{R}^n\text{\\} K$$ is open?

We started with an arbitrary point $y \in \mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ and have now shown that there exists an open ball around $y$ that is entirely contained in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$.

So, each point of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is an interior point of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$. This means that $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is open.

Another way to say the same thing: $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ can be written as the union of open balls (choose an open ball for each such point $y$ as above and take the union of all such balls). Since any union (finite, infinite, doesn't matter) of open sets is open, this proves openness of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$.
 
Krylov said:
Yes, you are right. The set $\{ x \in \mathbb{R}^n \ \mid \ \mid \mid x - y \mid \mid \lt \frac{1}{ j_0 } \} $ is just the open ball of radius $\frac{1}{j_0}$ centered at $y$, so certainly $y$ is in it.
We started with an arbitrary point $y \in \mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ and have now shown that there exists an open ball around $y$ that is entirely contained in $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$.

So, each point of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is an interior point of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$. This means that $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ is open.

Another way to say the same thing: $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$ can be written as the union of open balls (choose an open ball for each such point $y$ as above and take the union of all such balls). Since any union (finite, infinite, doesn't matter) of open sets is open, this proves openness of $\mathbb{R}^n \setminus K$.
Thanks Krylov... your post was extremely helpful...

Appreciate your help and guidance...

Peter
 

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K