HelloThe problem isfind the value of [tex]\lambda[/tex] for

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alejandrito29
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the value of \(\lambda\) for the limit \(\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} < 1\), where \(a_n = \frac{(\lambda^n n!)^2}{(2n+1)!}\) with \(\lambda > 0\). The user initially misapplies the factorial definition, incorrectly stating that \((2n+1)! = 3 \cdot 5 \cdot \ldots \cdot (2n+1)\). The correct interpretation is that \((2n+1)!\) includes all integers up to \(2n+1\). The correct values of \(\lambda\) are established as \(\lambda \in \{0, 2\}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with factorial notation and properties
  • Knowledge of sequences and series
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Ratio Test for convergence of series
  • Learn about the properties of factorial functions
  • Explore the implications of Stirling's approximation for large \(n\)
  • Investigate the behavior of sequences defined by factorials
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus or analysis, and anyone interested in understanding limits and factorial functions in sequences.

alejandrito29
Messages
148
Reaction score
0
Hello
The problem is
find the value of [tex]\lambda[/tex] for [tex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n} \nonumber\[/tex] < 1, where

[tex]a_n= \frac{(\lambda^nn!)^2}{(2n+1)!} \nonumber\[/tex] con [tex]\lambda >0[/tex]

I tried to do:
[tex]\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_n}=\frac{(\lambda^{n+1}(n+1)!)^2}{(2n+3)!}\cdot \frac{(2n+1)!}{(\lambda^nn!)^2}[/tex]

[tex]=( \frac{\lambda^{n+1}}{\lambda^n}\frac{(n+1)!}{n!})^2\frac{(2n+1)!}{(2n+3)!}[/tex]

[tex]\frac{(2n+1)!}{(2n+3)!}= \frac{3 \cdot 5 \cdot 7...(2n+1)}{5 \cdot 7 ...(2n+1) \cdot (2n+3)}[/tex]

[tex]= ( \lambda (n+1))^2\frac{3}{(2n+3)}[/tex]

but the Answer is [tex]\lambda \in {0,2}[/tex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org


You write

[tex](2n+1)!=3\cdot 5\cdot ...\cdot (2n+1)[/tex]

but this is not true. The factorial sign demands you to multiplicate ALL numbers under 2n+1. So the correct formula is

[tex](2n+1)=1\cdot 2\cdot 3\cdot 4\cdot ...\cdot (2n+1)[/tex]

Thesame remark applies to 2n+3.

It's not because you take the factorial of 2n+1 that you can only multiplicate the odd numbers! In fact, 2n+1 is simply a number, for example if n=3, then 2n+1 is 7, and (2n+1)!=7!=7.6.5.4.3.2.1.
 


very thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K