Help Applying Search Rule Weitzman (1979)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mathlover
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Search
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Weitzman's (1979) optimal search model for decision-making involving n boxes, each with a reward $x_i$ and associated costs $c_i$. The participant seeks to derive the reservation price $z_i$ for cases where the discount factor $0 < \beta_i < 1$. The proposed formula for $z_i$ is confirmed as correct: z_i=(\beta_i*p_i*R_i-c_i)/(\beta_i*p_i+(1-\beta_i)). The discussion emphasizes the importance of validating this formula by substituting it back into the original equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Weitzman's optimal search model
  • Familiarity with probability distributions and expected values
  • Knowledge of mathematical integration and its application in economics
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving discount factors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of varying discount factors in decision-making models
  • Explore advanced topics in probability theory related to iid distributions
  • Learn about the application of reservation prices in economic theory
  • Investigate the derivation and application of optimal search strategies in economics
USEFUL FOR

Economists, decision theorists, and researchers interested in optimal search strategies and their mathematical foundations will benefit from this discussion.

mathlover
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was wondering if you could help me make sure I have things correct. Weitzman (1979) (Optimal search for the best alternative) considers a decision maker that is facing n boxes, each box has potential reward $x_i $with probability distribution $f(x_i)$ (iid). It costs $c_i$ to open the box and learn its contents. There is a discount factor $\beta_i$ for each box. The paper shows that each box has a reservation price $z_i$ that satisfies:

\begin{equation}
c_i = \beta_i \int_{z_i}^\infty (x_i-z_j)\textrm{d}f(x_i)-(1-\beta_i)z_i
\end{equation}Then, the paper gives a specific example where $\beta_i=1$, each box has reward $R_i$ with probability $p_i$ and reward of 0 with probability $1-p_i$. It is given that in this case:
\begin{equation}
z_i=(p_i*R_i-c_i)/p_i
\end{equation}

Now, I'm trying to find out what the $z_i$ would be if $0<\beta_i<1.$ I believe that it is:
\begin{equation}
z_i=(\beta_i*p_i*R_i-c_i)/(\beta_i*p_i+(1-\beta_i))
\end{equation}

The reason I believe this is the solution is due to the following steps i took:
\begin{equation}
\int_{z_i}^\infty (x_i-z_j)\textrm{d}f(x_i)=p_i*(R_i-z_i)
\end{equation}
(I got this from the solution the paper provided for the case where $\beta_i=1$.)

Then, we have
\begin{equation}
c_i = \beta_i*p_i*(R_i-z_i)-(1-\beta_i)z_i
\end{equation}

And,
\begin{equation}
c_i = \beta_i*p_i*R_i-\beta_i*p_i*z_i-(1-\beta_i)z_i
\end{equation}

Thus,
\begin{equation}
c_i = \beta_i*p_i*R_i-z_i*[\beta_i*p_i+(1-\beta_i)]
\end{equation}

Giving us,
\begin{equation}
z_i=(\beta_i*p_i*R_i-c_i)/(\beta_i*p_i+(1-\beta_i))
\end{equation}

However, I had previously calculated it as
\begin{equation}
z_i=(\beta_i*p_i*R_i-c_i)/(\beta_i*p_i)
\end{equation}
(I don't know how I had calculated this) and now I am doubting myself as to which one is the correct solution. Can you help me here?

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your newer solution looks correct to me. If you are unsure, why not substitute it for ##z_i## in the original equation and see if it works?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K