Help calculating reflectance capture diameters

  • Level: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter s32a
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 754 views · last reply
s32a
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
Hi, my background is in CS and I've no formal physics training. I'd like to check my understanding if anyone's willing. I'm currently messing around with single-fiber reflectance spectroscopy with external illumination as a side project. I'm using an Ocean Optics Red Tide spectrometer paired with a P-400S SMA 400um core fiber. I have two LED arrays covering VIS-NIR, producing two distinct spikes that can be modeled out. My use-case requires compact illumination and halogen bulbs are too bulky; I'm still looking at lenses.

1) For bare fiber, the fiber core diameter is essentially acting as its own aperture, correct?
Hand-drawn diagram of a fiber probe above a surface: a blue-outlined box at top with a brown rectangle, a green cone of acceptance rays converging to a point, an orange ray tilted at an angle, a dimension arrow labelled h, and an angle theta marked at the apex.


Where anything inside the green cone is within the acceptance angle but something like the orange ray would be too acute and maybe diffuse into the cladding. So to calculate the capture diameter it would essentially be:
D = 2h*tan(θ) +0.04cm where θ is the acceptance half angle?

For example, resulting in an approximate 1.6cm capture diameter at 3.5cm height given a 12.7° half angle. This doesn't guarantee signal, but just defines the boundaries at which light /can/ reflect into the fiber.

2) That assumes the fiber is normal to the surface and so I was trying to figure out how this changes given some measure of angular tilt in order to account for it.

Diagram of a fiber acceptance cone: a black ellipse at top represents the fiber end, with a small orange rectangle at its center, and green lines run from it down to a larger green ellipse at the base.


I think I need to consider it as a cone intersecting a plane, but I'm not really sure. If so, using a 3.5cm height again, would it be:

D_1 = D * cos2(θ) / ( cos2(θ) - sin2(ϕ)) = 16.3 cm

D_2 = D * √( sin2(θ) - sin2(ϕ)) / sin(θ) ) = 14.8 cm
where ϕ is the tilt angle (5° here)?

Maybe I can just use a distance sensor array or a gimbal to maintain normality, but I'd like to understand the theory too, please.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
ah, I can't seem to edit. I typo'd the decimal place, that should be 1.63 and 1.48 cm.
The formula latex is:

$$D = 2h\tan(\theta)+0.04\ \mathrm{cm} \quad\text{where $\theta$ = 12.7$^\circ$}$$
$$D=1.617518131\text{cm}$$
$$D_1 = D*\frac{\cos^2(\theta)}{\cos^2(\theta)-\sin^2(\phi)} = 1.63\ \mathrm{cm}$$
$$D_2 = D* \frac{\sqrt{\sin^2(\theta)-\sin^2(\phi)}}{\sin(\theta)} = 1.48\ \mathrm{cm}$$