Help Choosing Career: Physics vs Engineering for Private Sector Job

  • Thread starter Thread starter question123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Career
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the decision-making process regarding pursuing a degree in physics versus engineering, particularly in relation to career prospects in the private sector. Participants explore concerns about job opportunities, the nature of work in academia versus industry, and the relevance of each degree to developing new technologies.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to work in product development for new technologies, such as quantum computing, and fears that a physics degree may limit opportunities to academia.
  • Another participant argues that many physics graduates find jobs in the private sector, sharing personal experience transitioning from physics to software development, but notes the need for additional programming skills.
  • Concerns are raised about the prevalence of "horror stories" regarding physicists feeling trapped in academia, with a counterpoint suggesting that such stories may be exaggerated given the competitive nature of academic positions.
  • Some participants suggest that engineering may provide a more direct path to product development roles in the private sector compared to physics.
  • A question is posed regarding the differences in career trajectories between physics and engineering graduates, particularly in research and development roles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of choosing a physics versus an engineering degree, with some supporting the idea that engineering is a clearer path to private sector jobs, while others believe that physics graduates can also succeed outside of academia. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best choice for a career in product development.

Contextual Notes

Participants' perspectives are influenced by personal experiences and anecdotal evidence, and there is a noted uncertainty about the future job market and the evolving nature of career paths in STEM fields.

question123
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
First of all, I know that some topic might cover my question but I felt I needed to write this ( maybe to calm myself) :)

To summarise, my dream job would be to develop product in the new technology (quantum computing as an example) for private company. A decent salary would be nice also.

In a couple week, I'll have to decide if I start a undergratuade degree in honours math/phys or in spatial or physical engineering. At first, my choice would be math/phys and I am planning to pursue with graduate study.

Now:my big fear! After many research and talking to my teacher, I'm afraid that as I finish my physics study (at least a major) I will be (no disrespect to those who chose this path) stuck in a university. My fear is also the reason why I'm considering engineering, because I think that this path is more likely to open the gate of private sector.

So is it true that majoring in physics traps you in a university or is there hope to work for the private sector with a decent salary? Also, as I told you my dream job, would engineering be more appropriate than physics or am I wrong?

Thanks a lot! (Hope that my text didn't annoy you to much):blushing:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You mentioned you wanted a job developing physical products for a private company. In terms of that goal a degree in engineering is probably the clearest and most direct path. It depends of course on what exactly you want to work on.

Addressing your question about being trapped in academia because of physics, that is not generally true in my experience. At least in the United States it seems most people that do physics in school (both undergraduate and graduate), end up in the private sector eventually. I made the transition from physics to software development. I did however need a lot more programming/development knowledge and experience than one would necessarily get during the course of a physics PhD.
 
I'm always mind-boggled by these concerns coming from what seem like HS students usually without any foresight into how different things could get while studying in college.

A preference for subject matter can change, your dream job might change, things can change. It's definitely good to have a track and set yourself on that track but you should realize that things change and everyone has the power to change things which is why there should not be a fear of being "stuck".
 
question123 said:
Maybe I shouldn't be afraid, but after searching through internet I Mostly

found horror story of physicist ending up in job in academia even if they didnt want to. Not saying that academia is horror... But as of today, that's not what I consider even though it might change

Horror stories of being stuck in academia? considering how competitive it is to get a professorship in academia I doubt there are many of these stories.
 
gbeagle said:
You mentioned you wanted a job developing physical products for a private company. In terms of that goal a degree in engineering is probably the clearest and most direct path. It depends of course on what exactly you want to work on.

Addressing your question about being trapped in academia because of physics, that is not generally true in my experience. At least in the United States it seems most people that do physics in school (both undergraduate and graduate), end up in the private sector eventually. I made the transition from physics to software development. I did however need a lot more programming/development knowledge and experience than one would necessarily get during the course of a physics PhD.

I agree with gbeagle - studying engineering is an excellent preparation for someone who wants to make products with new technology.

Also, at least in the US, getting a job with an engineering degree is much easier than doing so with a physics degree.
 
So I guess that people studying physics are the one interested in fundamental research and the one studying engineering are more likely to do R and D for private company?

Also, any utility to have a degree in physics than a master degree in engineering?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K