Help clear up my confusion regarding AMO and NANO Majors

  • Context: Programs 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Delta31415
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusion Nano
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences and relationships between AMO (Atomic, Molecular, and Optical) physics and nanotechnology (NANO) as academic majors or specializations. Participants explore the implications of these fields being categorized differently across various institutions and seek guidance on recommended paths of study within these areas.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that AMO physics is often considered a specific field of physics, while nanotechnology is described as an interdisciplinary area that spans multiple scientific disciplines.
  • One participant suggests that AMO physics may overlap with fields like physical chemistry and chemical physics, including aspects of optics and spectroscopy.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the scope of AMO physics is defined by organizations like the American Physical Society, focusing on fundamental research involving atoms, molecules, and light.
  • Nanotechnology is characterized by its focus on structures and systems at the nanoscale, which is inherently interdisciplinary, involving various fields such as engineering and biology.
  • There is a question regarding why AMO and NANO are categorized differently in academic programs, with a request for clarity on recommended paths of study for each major.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the categorization and scope of AMO and NANO, indicating that there is no consensus on the best approach to understanding or selecting between these fields.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the ambiguity in the definitions and scopes of AMO and NANO, as well as the varying academic structures across institutions that may influence how these fields are presented to students.

Delta31415
Messages
90
Reaction score
8
I have a decent understanding of Nano and AMO physics, however when I started looking at colleges(applications started recently). I found out that the nano major is an interdisciplinary major or a specialization under either applied physics or electrical engineering.

AMO is in some places its own major(molecular engineering vs nano), but commonly its a specialization under the physics department. So can some one clear up the confusion as I am lost, not knowing what major to apply for.

I hopefully plan to do aerospace and specialization in nano or do an applied physics major or even a double major. Might even do something random like molecular engineering in the medical field.

So my question is what are the differences between AMO and NANO and what is a recommend path of study for NANO/AMO

btw thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure if this helps you or not: but AMO Physics seems to follow the meaning of Physical Chemistry or Chemical Physics, maybe to include Optics and Spectroscopy. (Quickly done google search)
 
At the institutions with which I am familiar, AMO physics is very different from NANO.
 
Delta31415 said:
I have a decent understanding of Nano and AMO physics, ...
If this were true, you wouldn't be confounding the two. Just to be sure that I'm interpreting your use of these acronyms correctly,

AMO physics = Atomic, Molecular, and Optical physics

Nano = Nanotechnology

Is that consistent with your usage?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta31415
CrysPhys said:
If this were true, you wouldn't be confounding the two. Just to be sure that I'm interpreting your use of these acronyms correctly,

AMO physics = Atomic, Molecular, and Optical physics

Nano = Nanotechnology

Is that consistent with your usage?

yea
 
Dr. Courtney said:
At the institutions with which I am familiar, AMO physics is very different from NANO.

I get that are different, but my main question is why are they under interdisciplinary majors in some colleges and what's a recommended path of study for either.
 
To OP: You're not using terms of equal hierarchy.

AMO physics by definition is a specific field of physics. The scope of any field, of course, is somewhat arbitrary; but here's how the American Physical Society uses the term:https://www.aps.org/units/damop/

"The Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics (DAMOP) was founded in 1943, and was the first division of the American Physical Society. Its central focus is fundamental research on atoms, simple molecules, electrons and light, and their interactions. It plays an enabling role underlying many areas of science through the development of methods for the control and manipulation of atoms, molecules, charged particles and light, through precision measurements and calculations of their properties, and through the invention of new ways to generate light with specific properties. Students who graduate with a background in AMO physics acquire a broad range of knowledge and skills that enable them to contribute to many areas of science and technology."

Fields other than physics (e.g., chemistry, biology, electrical engineering, optical engineering ...) are, of course, concerned with various other aspects of atoms, molecules, and optics than that falling under the scope of AMO physics (though there may be some overlap).

Nanotechnology is an umbrella term covering aspects of structures and systems characterized by a particular size range. Again, the scope is somewhat arbitrary. According to the National Nanotechnology Initiative:https://www.nano.gov//

"Nanotechnology is science, engineering, and technology conducted at the nanoscale, which is about 1 to 100 nanometers."

Therefore, nanotechnology is inherently interdisciplinary since it involves all aspects of such structures and systems. You need to further delimit what your interests are under the nanotechnology umbrella.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta31415
I kno
CrysPhys said:
To OP: You're not using terms of equal hierarchy.

AMO physics by definition is a specific field of physics. The scope of any field, of course, is somewhat arbitrary; but here's how the American Physical Society uses the term:https://www.aps.org/units/damop/

"The Division of Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics (DAMOP) was founded in 1943, and was the first division of the American Physical Society. Its central focus is fundamental research on atoms, simple molecules, electrons and light, and their interactions. It plays an enabling role underlying many areas of science through the development of methods for the control and manipulation of atoms, molecules, charged particles and light, through precision measurements and calculations of their properties, and through the invention of new ways to generate light with specific properties. Students who graduate with a background in AMO physics acquire a broad range of knowledge and skills that enable them to contribute to many areas of science and technology."

Fields other than physics (e.g., chemistry, biology, electrical engineering, optical engineering ...) are, of course, concerned with various other aspects of atoms, molecules, and optics than that falling under the scope of AMO physics (though there may be some overlap).

Nanotechnology is an umbrella term covering aspects of structures and systems characterized by a particular size range. Again, the scope is somewhat arbitrary. According to the National Nanotechnology Initiative:https://www.nano.gov//

"Nanotechnology is science, engineering, and technology conducted at the nanoscale, which is about 1 to 100 nanometers."

Therefore, nanotechnology is inherently interdisciplinary since it involves all aspects of such structures and systems. You need to further delimit what your interests are under the nanotechnology umbrella.

Thanks for the info
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K