Help coming up with the right algebra formula to use.

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra Formula
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around formulating a strategy for betting on a slot machine that charges a random price to play and has a random payout probability. Participants explore how to weigh potential gains against risks to determine when to place a bet based on the cost to play and the likelihood of winning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Jacob describes a slot machine that charges a random price (X) and has a random payout probability (Y), seeking a formula to determine when to bet.
  • One participant suggests a simple condition: (100/X)*Y > 1 indicates to bet, while (100/X)*Y < 1 indicates not to bet.
  • Another participant proposes betting when Y > X, assuming a risk-neutral stance.
  • Concerns are raised about the randomness of Y and X, questioning the lack of a probability distribution and the implications of playing before or after the price is revealed.
  • It is noted that assuming a payout of 50% or more when playing games priced under $0.50 could be a dangerous assumption without knowing the odds.
  • Jacob clarifies the scenario, emphasizing that the price is known before deciding to play and reiterates the need for a formula that balances potential gain against risk.
  • One participant states that if the expected payout (Y) is greater than the cost to play (X), then it is advisable to play.
  • Another participant reiterates that Y represents the likelihood of winning $1, not the payout itself.
  • It is suggested that betting is advisable as long as the price to play is lower than the chance of winning.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding the randomness of the odds and the price, leading to an unresolved discussion on the best approach to formulate a betting strategy.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding the probability distribution of payouts and the implications of making assumptions about the odds of winning. There is an emphasis on the need for clarity regarding when the price is revealed in relation to the decision to play.

wasteofo2
Messages
477
Reaction score
2
So, this may be the simplest question ever asked here, but my brain fails massively and I need help. Here's the situation, any help would be greatly appreciated.

There's a slot machine which randomly charges between $0.01 and $1.00 to play, and will either pay out $1 or nothing. Let's call the price to play X. X is completely random.

The likelihood that the slot machine will pay out $1 on a particular turn can be called Y. Let's assume that one can know Y. The odds for any particular turn are completely random.

So without knowing Y, to make money one would just play the turns priced lower than $0.50, and over time you'd make money.

But knowing Y, you should be able to make bets even on turns that cost close to $1 if you choose only to play those with very favorable odds.

But what is the best way to account for both the potential gain and the risk to come up with the "winning formula"?

Thanks,
Jacob
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Could it be as simple as:
(100/X)*Y>1 means bet
(100/X)*Y<1 means don't bet
?
 
With odds Y%, you bet when Y > X (X in cents). At least, assuming you're risk-neutral.
 
What do you mean that the odds Y are completely random? Or for that matter that the price is completely random? Unless you put some probability distribution on there then you have no way of knowing what to do. And do you have to agree to play *before* the price is revealed, or do you choose to play or not play after the price is revealed.

Choosing to play the games where the price is less than fifty cents doesn't guarantee you make a winning in the long run: what if the odds of getting 0 in return were 1 in 1? Your 'rule' there tacitly assumes that the game pays out 50% of the time, or more accurately that the expected pay out is 50 cents. That is a dangerous assumption. If you don't know the odds of winning then you should *never* play, to be absolutely safe.
 
Last edited:
matt grime said:
What do you mean that the odds Y are completely random? Or for that matter that the price is completely random? Unless you put some probability distribution on there then you have no way of knowing what to do. And do you have to agree to play *before* the price is revealed, or do you choose to play or not play after the price is revealed.

Choosing to play the games where the price is less than fifty cents doesn't guarantee you make a winning in the long run: what if the odds of getting 0 in return were 1 in 1? Your 'rule' there tacitly assumes that the game pays out 50% of the time, or more accurately that the expected pay out is 50 cents. That is a dangerous assumption. If you don't know the odds of winning then you should *never* play, to be absolutely safe.

Guess I explained it poorly at the beginning. Lemme give it another shot, using a different situation that may be more clear.There are many slot machine which all pay out either $1 or nothing.

Before each turn, all of the machines display a price-to-play between $0.01 and $1.00. The price is X. Each machine displays different prices at random, but that's unimportant since the price is always known before deciding to play.

What differentiates the machines is that each machine has a different % likelihood that it will pay-out, the % likelihood of a pay-out for a machine is Y.So what I'm looking for is a formula that will weigh the possibly gain against the risk of actually making it to give some result that will, if followed out enough times to be statistically significant, yield profit. Basically a number that I know "if it's below this, don't bet, if it's above this, bet."

Thanks a lot, hope this is more clear,
Jacob

P.S. Would it be as simple only betting when the value of Y/X is one?
 
Last edited:
Can I write it as I see it? You are given a slot machine, it will cost you X dollars to play (X is somewhere between 0.01 and 1). Given that I know what X is should I play if the expected pay out on that machine is Y dollars? Yes if Y is more than X no otherwise.
 
matt grime said:
Can I write it as I see it? You are given a slot machine, it will cost you X dollars to play (X is somewhere between 0.01 and 1). Given that I know what X is should I play if the expected pay out on that machine is Y dollars? Yes if Y is more than X no otherwise.

Y doesn't represent the payout, the payout will only ever be $1 or nothing. Y is the likelihood that you will actually make the $1.
 
As long as the price to play is lower than the chance of winning, then you should bet.

For example, if there is a $.50 game with a 51% chance of winning, then if you played it 1000 times you would most likely have won about $510 and used $500 for play.

So an algebraic way of stating this would be "Play if Y > X", where Y is the cost to play in cents and X is the likelihood to win $1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K