Help critique my problem solving and thinking process (problem included)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on problem-solving techniques in mechanics, specifically regarding a climbing scenario involving forces and friction. The climber's weight is 533.8 N, and the angles involved are 30 degrees and 40 degrees. Participants emphasize the importance of resolving forces in the x and y directions and taking moments about strategic points to simplify the equations. Key strategies include using substitution and recognizing relationships between forces to solve for unknowns, such as tension and the coefficient of static friction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of static friction and its coefficient
  • Knowledge of force resolution in two dimensions
  • Familiarity with torque and moment equations
  • Basic algebraic manipulation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of force resolution in mechanics
  • Learn how to apply torque equations in static equilibrium problems
  • Explore substitution methods in algebra for solving equations
  • Investigate the relationship between normal force and friction in climbing scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, engineering, and climbing safety who are looking to enhance their problem-solving skills in mechanics and understand the application of forces in real-world scenarios.

ryley
Messages
20
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
I'm having difficulty seeing how to take math and apply it to the situation. Or recognizing when I can use a technique.
Relevant Equations
Fnetx=0
Fnety=0
Fnetz=0
Hello all, thanks for reading my post! I'm posting as I need help with my problem solving and thinking approach. For the most part I can figure out how to set up the problem and what I need to find, but my problem lies in textbook questions that rely more on seeing a more math based approach to solving rather than thinking about the concepts. What I mean is, the concepts are easy to see but minimal information is given leaving multiple variables and so methods like substitution are needed as well as other algebraic techniques. I'll post a question that this applies to and show my thinking process as well as a diagram. If anyone is able to help me identify what exactly it is I'm doing wrong so as to help me determine a solution to a problem it would be greatly appreciated.

Question

A climber with a weight of 533.8 N is held by a belay rope connected to her climbing harness and belay device; the force of the rope on her has a line of action through her center of mass. The indicated angles are 30 degrees(top) and 40 degrees(bottom). If her feet are on the verge of slipping on the vertical wall, what is the coefficient of static friction between her climbing shoes and the wall?

First thoughts
- I will need to sum the forces in x and y directions as well as torques.
- doing this yields a few unknowns and I can't seem to see a way to solve for one and sub it in or equate any of them.
- I think It will be best to use her foot contacting the wall as the origin to eliminate the Fs and FN from the torque equations, but that still leaves me with tension as an unknown.
- The force net equations also have unknowns that I can't see a way to solve for.

This Is where I get stuck and can't see a way to solve for what I need as its not about applying concepts anymore instead it is more math. The solution shows to use some substitution as well as equating two equations, this isn't the hard part to solve as I can do the algebra but its seeing that, that is what I'm suppose to do that I'm having trouble realizing.

I'll attach a picture of the diagram as well as the solution.

Thanks for any help!
 

Attachments

  • climber solution.gif
    climber solution.gif
    6.7 KB · Views: 358
  • climber diagram.jpg
    climber diagram.jpg
    10.8 KB · Views: 377
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for some help! For the coefficient I'd need in this case the Normal force of her shoes on the wall to solve for Fs and I think tension in order to solve one of the equations that has one of the unknowns I need for the friction coefficient. I see the components I need, like Fs FN and Tension but how to set up equations to solve I don't see.
 
ryley said:
Hello all, thanks for reading my post! I'm posting as I need help with my problem solving and thinking approach. For the most part I can figure out how to set up the problem and what I need to find, but my problem lies in textbook questions that rely more on seeing a more math based approach to solving rather than thinking about the concepts.

So a general mantra for these simpler mechanics problems is "Resolve, Resolve, take Moments". The first step is to get these equations. You can resolve in x, resolve in y, and take moments about an appropriate point. Note that a system of three equations can let you solve three unknowns, not more.

ryley said:
- I think It will be best to use her foot contacting the wall as the origin to eliminate the Fs and FN from the torque equations, but that still leaves me with tension as an unknown.

Good thinking. Yes, that leaves you with an unknown, but can you solve for it? Write out the moment equation and see if you can solve for tension. (HINT: you can)

You have also highlighted another good tip- resolve at a point where you can get rid of lots of forces. We want to make it easy for us to solve, so we want as few variables as possible.

This problem doesn't require much algebra when you write out the equations.

Hope that is of some help.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ryley
Master1022 said:
So a general mantra for these simpler mechanics problems is "Resolve, Resolve, take Moments". The first step is to get these equations. You can resolve in x, resolve in y, and take moments about an appropriate point. Note that a system of three equations can let you solve three unknowns, not more.
Good thinking. Yes, that leaves you with an unknown, but can you solve for it? Write out the moment equation and see if you can solve for tension. (HINT: you can)

You have also highlighted another good tip- resolve at a point where you can get rid of lots of forces. We want to make it easy for us to solve, so we want as few variables as possible.

This problem doesn't require much algebra when you write out the equations.

Hope that is of some help.
Thanks for the help, I think I need to stick with the problem a bit longer, the solution just seemed to use a lot of techniques that don't dawn on my immediately, so maybe sticking with it for a little longer will help me to see clearer a way to solve.
 
ryley said:
It will be best to use her foot contacting the wall as the origin to eliminate the Fs and FN from the torque equations,
That can be best, but not here. You need the relationship between those two forces in order to find the coefficient. What you would rather not have to care about is the tension. What does that suggest for an axis?
 
haruspex said:
That can be best, but not here. You need the relationship between those two forces in order to find the coefficient. What you would rather not have to care about is the tension. What does that suggest for an axis?
Interesting, okay so you are asking which point should I use as the pivot to eliminate tension? if that's the case then I would think using the climbers center of mass as that would be where tension would have a moment arm of zero. Thanks!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: hutchphd and PeroK
I looked at the solution you posted. Note that ##\cos(90- x) = \sin x## and ##\sin(180 - x) = \sin x##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
998