Help designing/finding a vendor for this magnetic field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around finding or designing an appropriate electromagnet that can provide a repelling force of 20 to 40 lbf for a specific application. Participants explore the types of electromagnets available, their configurations, and the practical challenges involved in achieving the desired magnetic force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an electromagnet that can provide a repelling force of 20 to 40 lbf, expressing frustration with existing products that are primarily holding magnets.
  • Another participant notes that the repelling force is dependent on the distance between the poles.
  • There is a clarification regarding the scenario where opposing poles are in contact, leading to confusion about the terminology used for the poles.
  • A suggestion is made to use iron cylinders to modify the existing electromagnet design to create a more isolated magnetic field source.
  • Concerns are raised about the stability of the repelling force when using holding electromagnets, particularly when the poles are in the same plane.
  • One participant proposes constraining the motion of the magnet to an axial direction to improve stability.
  • A later reply indicates a realization that a solenoid may be the appropriate type of electromagnet needed for the application.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying opinions on the types of electromagnets suitable for the task, with no consensus on a specific solution or design. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to achieve the desired magnetic force.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations in finding suitable electromagnets for sale, particularly noting that many available options are designed for holding rather than repelling applications. There is also an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in achieving the required force with the desired configuration.

13Nike
Messages
44
Reaction score
5
I need help find a electromagnet suitable for this http://imgur.com/a/vkm4T
Each electromagnet (the 3 in the center) needs a repelling force of about 20 to 40lbf. I stupidly bought these from amazon http://a.co/aSftIat. Its a holding electromagnet so the N and S poles are essentially on the same plane and are meant to to hold metal sheets. Googling around for other electromagnets bring up hundreds of other holding magnets. Is there a name for the type of electromagnet magnet i have in my design? What do I actually need? Is it even feasible for me to get that much force from each component in the size of say a con of soda?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
Repelling force depends on distance the poles are apart.
 
What is the actual practical problem you need to solve ?
 
I also want to ask
NascentOxygen said:
Repelling force depends on distance the poles are apart.

In this scenario it would be when the opposing poles are touching.
 
13Nike said:
In this scenario it would be when the opposing poles are touching.
Opposing poles? Are these the opposite of opposite poles?

Like when like poles are touching? [emoji857]
 
NascentOxygen said:
Opposing poles? Are these the opposite of opposite poles?

Like when like poles are touching? [emoji857]
Sorry for the poor English. Say electromagnet #1 is fixed. I need to introduce electromagnet #2 whose say north pole touches the north pole of electromagnet #1 with a required force of 20 to 40lbf (this is a range of what's acceptable)
 
13Nike said:
from amazon http://a.co/aSftIat. Its a holding electromagnet so the N and S poles are essentially on the same plane
Get some iron cylinders that match the diameter of the inner pole and have a length that is about 2-3 times the diameter of the pole. Superglue the iron cylinder onto the center pole to extend it out away from the opposite surrounding pole structure. The magnet won't be as strong, but it will give you an isolated magnetic field source.

But, are you saying that when you bring two of these "holding" electromagnets close to each other and drive them with the same direction of current, they don't repel each other strongly? Both the inner and outer poles will generate repulsive forces that will be pretty strong...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
berkeman said:
Get some iron cylinders that match the diameter of the inner pole and have a length that is about 2-3 times the diameter of the pole. Superglue the iron cylinder onto the center pole to extend it out away from the opposite surrounding pole structure. The magnet won't be as strong, but it will give you an isolated magnetic field source.

But, are you saying that when you bring two of these "holding" electromagnets close to each other and drive them with the same direction of current, they don't repel each other strongly? Both the inner and outer poles will generate repulsive forces that will be pretty strong...

the ones I bought do repel but its unstable since the poles are in the same plane. Imaging a cup where the outer rim is one pole and a center column is the opposite pole.
 
13Nike said:
its unstable since the poles are in the same plane
But can you constrain the motion of the magnet to be in the axial direction only? Like with an outer plastic tube?
 
  • #10
berkeman said:
But can you constrain the motion of the magnet to be in the axial direction only? Like with an outer plastic tube?
Yes this would be the case
 
  • #11
13Nike said:
Yes this would be the case
So you're good to go, right?
 
  • #12
berkeman said:
So you're good to go, right?
Well the issue is that for some reason I can't a simple electromagnet for sale that produces strong forces. Most of the ones I find are holding magnets. Similar to that of the cup formation /horse shoe. I need an electromagnet that is like that of a bar magnet
 
  • #13
Ahh I am such an idiot. I need a solonoid.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
12K