Help in deducing a equation for Neutral red

  • Thread starter Thread starter demander
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Neutral
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the equation for the concentration ratio of Neutral Red and its protonated form, HNR+. The key equation to prove is \(\frac{[NR]}{[HNR^{+}]}=\frac{A-A_{HNR}}{A_{NR}-A}\), using provided equations related to absorbance and concentration. The user attempts to manipulate equations involving absorbance (\(A\)), molar absorptivity (\(\epsilon\)), and total concentration (\(C_{Total}\)) but struggles to reach the final form. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the relationships between absorbance and concentration in the context of Neutral Red.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of acid-base equilibria and pKa concepts.
  • Familiarity with absorbance equations in spectrophotometry.
  • Knowledge of molar absorptivity and its role in concentration calculations.
  • Ability to manipulate algebraic equations and ratios.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation for acid-base equilibria.
  • Learn about spectrophotometric methods for determining pKa values.
  • Research the role of molar absorptivity in absorbance calculations.
  • Examine case studies involving Neutral Red in chemical experiments.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, researchers in analytical chemistry, and anyone involved in spectrophotometric analysis of pH indicators like Neutral Red.

demander
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Hi to all, hope you can help me with a problem that took me almost all the week

Homework Statement


To find The Pka of Neutral Red, i had to use this expression \frac{A-A_{HNR}}{A_{NR}-A}
So Now I Have to show that \frac{[NR]}{[HNR^{+}]}=\frac{A-A_{HNR}}{A_{NR}-A}
i tried backwards and i did it, but starting from the concnetrations is far more dificult

Homework Equations


i Have to prove that equallity using only this equations
C_{HNR^{+}} + C_{NR}=C_{Total}(1)

A_{HNR^{+}}=\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{total}(2)

A_{NR}=\epsilon_{NR}.b.C_{total}(3)

A=\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{HNR^{+}} + \epsilon_{NR}.b.C_{NR} (4)

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to solve 4 in order to C_{HNR^{+}} first and then in order to C_{NR}.
I arrive to
C_{HNR^{+}}=\frac{A-\epsilon_{NR}.b.C_{NR}}{\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b}
C_{NR}=\frac{A-\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{HNR^{+}}}{\epsilon_{NR}.b}

then i did the following, added and subtracted the same value in the fraction numerator, like this:
C_{NR}=\frac{A+\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{NR}-\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{HNR^{+}}-\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{NR}}{\epsilon_{NR}.b}

so i could do:
C_{NR}=\frac{A+\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{NR}-\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.(C_{HNR^{+}}+C_{NR}}{\epsilon_{NR}.b}
and using equation 1 it came
C_{NR}=\frac{A+\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{NR}-\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.(C_{t})}{\epsilon_{NR}.b}
then using equation 2:
C_{NR}=\frac{A+\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{NR}-A_{HNR^{+}}}{\epsilon_{NR}.b}

doing the same thing to HNR it came:
C_{HNR}=\frac{A+\epsilon_{NR}.b.C_{HNR}-A_{NR}}{\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b}

So doing the reason
\frac{[NR]}{[HNR^{+}]}=\frac{\frac{A+\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{NR}-A_{HNR^{+}}}{\epsilon_{NR}.b}}{\frac{A+\epsilon_{NR}.b.C_{HNR}-A_{NR}}{\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b}}
and it's here where i can't see how can i arrive to the final equation
am i going for the worst way? i thought about this all week and can't find a way to prove what i should :cry:


hope someone can help me, it's kind of urgent
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The backwards trying was easy... but if i try to do the reverse... the multiplying term is not to clear how it showed off from the equations i give cause backwards the final term is:
\frac{C_{NR}(\epsilon_{NR}-\epsilon_{HNR})}{C_{HNR^{+}}(\epsilon_{NR}-\epsilon_{HNR})}}
so the thing i don't understand is that term:
(\epsilon_{NR}-\epsilon_{HNR}) where can it come from from the equation i have?
 
demander said:
A_{HNR^{+}}=\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{total}(2)
A_{NR}=\epsilon_{NR}.b.C_{total}(3)

Are you sure these are correct? Shouldn't it be:

A_{HNR^{+}}=\epsilon_{HNR^{+}}.b.C_{HNR^+}
A_{NR}=\epsilon_{NR}.b.C_{NR}
 
well i really had a doubt about that... cause i think In the two case, the absorvance is given in function of total conectration... these equations are giving in a protocol of the journal of chemistry, but they simnply say... we used this 4 equations and arrive to this :S
I couldn't seem to find that relation even trying very hard this week
 
Last edited:
Do you have the reference to the journal article? It's hard to figure out what the equations mean without knowledge of the details of the experiment and what is being measured.
 
http://jchemed.chem.wisc.edu/Journal/Issues/2001/Mar/PlusSub/JCESupp/JCE2001p0349W.pdf
that's the link to the article... i put the pages needed in the attchments if you can't acess the journal
 

Attachments

  • reference1.JPG
    reference1.JPG
    43.5 KB · Views: 439
  • reference2.JPG
    reference2.JPG
    47.2 KB · Views: 418
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K