Help limit problem multivariable

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the limit of a multivariable function as (x, y) approaches (0, 0). The expression is given as (x^2 + y^2) divided by (√(x^2 + y^2 + 1) - 1).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to evaluate the limit using polar coordinates and expresses confusion about arriving at the answer of 2. Some participants suggest methods such as L'Hôpital's rule or rationalizing the denominator to resolve the indeterminate form encountered.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring different methods to approach the limit, with some guidance provided on using polar coordinates and addressing the "0/0" form. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's progress in understanding the problem.

Contextual Notes

The original poster expresses frustration over the response time, indicating a desire for quicker assistance. There is also a light-hearted reference to the term "grasshopper" in the discussion.

yaho8888
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


lim (x^2+y^2)/((root(x^2+y^2+1) - 1)
(x,y)-->(0,0)
what is the limit


Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution


<br /> \lim_{(x,y) \to (0,0)} \frac {x^2 + y^2}{\sqrt{x^2 + y^2 + 1} - 1} = \lim_{r \to 0} \frac {r^2}{\sqrt{r^2 + 1} - 1}<br />

I got this far the answer are 2 but i don't know how it is 2.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
how come no one is helping?
 
Perhaps because people are not sitting around with nothing to do but answer your questions! You waited a whole 29 minutes? Patience, grasshopper.

Switching to polar coordinates is a very good idea. That way, (x,y) going to (0,0) is the same as the single variable, r, going to 0. As long as the result is independent of the angle \theta, that is the limit. Now, the difficulty is that when you substitute r= 0 in the fraction, you get "0/0". Do you remember any methods from Calculus I for doing that? Perhaps L'Hopital's rule? Or maybe "rationalizing the denominator" by multiplying both numerator and denominator by \sqrt{r^2+ 1}+ 1
 
thanks for the help. I got it! (one more thing, I am a grasshopper!) :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K