Help me come up with shock effect preventing technology (sci-fi book)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a technological challenge in a narrative set on an ocean planet where combat occurs underwater due to the dangers of being above sea level. The primary issue is the use of sea mines and the need for technology to mitigate their shock effects. One proposed solution involves enveloping the mines in a large air bubble to reduce the energy transfer upon detonation, with suggestions for a bubble diameter of three to four times that of the mine. This would require a specialized craft or drone capable of pressurizing air and creating the bubble underwater. An alternative approach discussed includes developing anti-explosive munitions from materials sourced underwater, enhancing the worldbuilding aspect. Additionally, the idea of background radiation from past conflicts is suggested as a narrative device to explain the underwater setting's dynamics. The conversation concludes with a note that the original poster has not been active recently, indicating the thread is effectively closed.
Antitank_Borshch
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
There is a problem in my technological concept that does not allow the normal development of the plot of the book. It takes place on an ocean planet where being above sea level is absolutely dangerous with the level of technology that exists there. So all combat operations there take place underwater, which automatically means the active use of sea mines. And I have trouble coming up with technology that can prevent the shock effect of them. And if it is not there, then the big question is why, with such an alignment as I describe in the book, people still exist there, and not just a pile of debris with corpses inside.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sea mine means a naval mine, not a mine on the bottom of the sea
 
It seems like if the mine could be enveloped by a large air bubble and the mine detonated, that its coupling of its energy to the water would be diminished. I don't know how large of a bubble would give what diminishing effect, but perhaps you can do some Google searching to see if it's been studied or modeled before. Hopefully something like a bubble diameter of 3-4X the diameter of the mine would give a large dampening effect.

If it could work, then you need to figure out a way to have a craft/drone that pressurizes air tanks at the surface, then submerges and approaches a mine from below. It somehow blows the bubble (maybe with some chemicals to increase the surface tension to hold the bubble together, and releases it with some detonator thing at the bottom/middle of the bubble...
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes phinds, hmmm27 and Antitank_Borshch
berkeman said:
It seems like if the mine could be enveloped by a large air bubble and the mine detonated, that its coupling of its energy to the water would be diminished. I don't know how large of a bubble would give what diminishing effect, but perhaps you can do some Google searching to see if it's been studied or modeled before. Hopefully something like a bubble diameter of 3-4X the diameter of the mine would give a large dampening effect.

If it could work, then you need to figure out a way to have a craft/drone that pressurizes air tanks at the surface, then submerges and approaches a mine from below. It somehow blows the bubble (maybe with some chemicals to increase the surface tension to hold the bubble together, and releases it with some detonator thing at the bottom/middle of the bubble...
Thanks for the informative reply. I like the idea of covering the mine with a substance that will dampen the shock effect of it, but floating to the surface of the ocean with such frequency and on such a scale is almost impossible due to the high density of the atmosphere, and therefore the extreme weather conditions that rage there. Because of this, I'm leaning more toward crafting special anti-explosive munitions in the form of capsules with a substance produced/mined underwater. And it will make the worldbuilding a lot more interesting and layered, so thanks again man.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Have you considered enhanced background radiation. I mean as another explanation for keeping things happening underwater? Perhaps due to some ancient conflict? I don't think nuclear weapons are the most effective EMPs, but who knows what people do when they have access to WMDs.

I have a couple of ideas but the less said the better. :P
 
OP last seen in February, so no need to spin our wheels anymore here. Thread closed.
 
A map of a four-dimensional planet is three dimensional, so such can exist in our Universe. I made one and posted a video to the Internet. This is all based on William Kingdon Clifford's math from the 19th century. It works like this. A 4D planet has two perpendicular planes of rotation. The intersection of such a plane with the surface of the planet is a great circle. We can define latitude as the arctan( distance from one plane/distance from the other plane). The set of all points...
Back
Top