Help me jazz up my English paper with science vocab!

  • Thread starter wasteofo2
  • Start date
  • #1
466
2
Here is the sentence in question which needs a jazz infusion:

"In Slaughterhouse-Five, Vonnegut is so jaded by death that he is unable to draw any meaningful distinction between any different kinds of death, whether they are the deaths of the innocent millions killed in Nazi concentration camps, the innocent millions killed in Allied bombings of civilian cities, or an innocent bottle of champagne killed by the slow diffusion of it’s carbon dioxide out of solution and into the atmosphere."

I want to change the last bit so it doesn't sound like the carbon dioxide diffused out of the champagne and into the atmosphere on it's own free will, but rather that the atmosphere maliciously sucked the carbon dioxide out of it's natural habitation in the champagne. Is there any sciencey word for the quality of a low pressure systems to induce diffusion where it would otherwise not occur?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
6,362
1,283
wasteofo2 said:
...or an innocent bottle of champagne killed by the slow diffusion of it’s carbon dioxide out of solution and into the atmosphere

"...or an innocent bottle of champagne killed by careless prolonged exposure to a carbon dioxide-sucking ambient atmosphere."

"...or an innocent bottle of champagne killed by deliberate, prolonged exposure to the open air."

"...or an innocent bottle of champagne killed by the slow vampirism of exposure to a CO2 hungry lower pressure system."
 
  • #3
dduardo
Staff Emeritus
1,891
3
Synonym to diffusion:

efflux

def. A flowing outward.
Usage 1: the red-blood-cell sodium ion efflux
Usage 2: the uptake and efflux of sodium ions

Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=efflux
 
  • #4
58
0
How is the word cant used when it means empty, solemn speech, implying what is not felt; insincere talk; hypocrisy. Is it right if I use it as the media had nothing in mind except releasing a barrage of cants to the public. "Cants" doesn't sound right to me..
 
  • #5
6,362
1,283
klusener said:
How is the word cant used when it means empty, solemn speech, implying what is not felt; insincere talk; hypocrisy. Is it right if I use it as the media had nothing in mind except releasing a barrage of cants to the public. "Cants" doesn't sound right to me..
I wouldn't use it at all. It's a very obscure word.
 
  • #6
466
2
I think I've settled on "or an innocent bottle of champagne killed by the slow assimilation of it’s carbon dioxide out of solution and into the atmosphere."
 
  • #7
58
0
Isn't it "its" and not "it's"?
 
  • #8
6,362
1,283
wasteofo2 said:
I think I've settled on "or an innocent bottle of champagne killed by the slow assimilation of it’s carbon dioxide out of solution and into the atmosphere."
Whatever pops your cork.
 
  • #9
466
2
klusener said:
Isn't it "its" and not "it's"?
I don't know, no one can ever convince me one way or another.

If you were to rephrase "The dog of Mr. Shapiro," you would say "Mr. Shapiro's dog," not "Mr. Shapiros dog," so it makes sense to me that you would just as well say "The carbon dioxide of it," and "It's carbon dioxide."
 
  • #10
6,362
1,283
wasteofo2 said:
I don't know, no one can ever convince me one way or another.

If you were to rephrase "The dog of Mr. Shapiro," you would say "Mr. Shapiro's dog," not "Mr. Shapiros dog," so it makes sense to me that you would just as well say "The carbon dioxide of it," and "It's carbon dioxide."
Conventional usage: its = possessive of "it"
it's = "it is"
 
  • #11
Danger
Gold Member
9,647
251
If you don't mind my saying so, I liked your original version better than any of the alternatives. It's succinct and more easily comprehended by someone with no scientific background.
 
  • #12
48
1
It's definitely it's. "Its" is the plural of "it". "It's" is the possessive.
 
  • #13
114
1
"Its" is the possessive. Stop this debate.

**Anyway, I agree with Danger. Although I don't like the sentence -- or perhaps paragraph -- in the first place, how it was first is probably the best. I think you just made the sentence more overblown and pompous =P.
 
Last edited:
  • #14
6,362
1,283
icvotria said:
It's definitely it's. "Its" is the plural of "it". "It's" is the possessive.
What's "its'"
 
  • #15
Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,558
53
icvotria said:
It's definitely it's. "Its" is the plural of "it". "It's" is the possessive.

Ack, no, the possessive of "it" is "its." The contraction for "it is" is "it's." And unless you're talking about clones of Cousin It, then the plural of "it" is "they."
 
  • #17
48
1
Knavish said:
"Its" is the possessive. Stop this debate.
Don't make me question my grasp of the written english language! It's DEFINITELY "it's". Definitely definitely definitely. Like "the bone was the dog's," not "the bone was the dogs." "Its" is the plural of "it."

Edit: "Pronouns have their own possessive forms (my, your, his, her, its, our, their)" Hmmm, I guess I was wrong :rolleyes: *hangs head in shame* Sorry!
 
Last edited:
  • #18
114
1
Yes, "it's" does seem very logical. But, remember, English isn't very logical.

Read the others' posts for explanations.
 
  • #19
6,362
1,283
Knavish said:
I think you just made the sentence more overblown and pompous =P.
I agree. You just want to make your point about Vonnegut, and get out of that sentence. No need to draw attention to the sentence itself.
 
  • #20
Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,558
53
icvotria said:
Don't make me question my grasp of the written english language! It's DEFINITELY "it's". Definitely definitely definitely. Like "the bone was the dog's," not "the bone was the dogs." "Its" is the plural of "it."
Sorry, but it's its. And I blame you Brits for this idiosyncrasy of possessives! :rofl: :tongue2:
 
  • #21
6,362
1,283
icvotria said:
Don't make me question my grasp of the written english language! It's DEFINITELY "it's". Definitely definitely definitely. Like "the bone was the dog's," not "the bone was the dogs." "Its" is the plural of "it."
Go to the link I posted. Pronouns have their own possessive forms: my, your, his, her, its, our, their.

"It's bone," is the grammar of too much champagne.
 
  • #22
48
1
zoobyshoe said:
Go to the link I posted. Pronouns have their own possessive forms: my, your, his, her, its, our, their.

"It's bone," is the grammar of too much champagne.
I went, I've edited, I'm embarrassed....
 
  • #23
6,362
1,283
Don't be. I only learned this last year, myself, after being teased by Nereid about misusing "it's" and "its".
 
  • #24
114
1
Haha, don't worry about it; I've seen this mistake made even in newspapers..

So.. I wonder if wasteofo2 even cares about this thread anymore.
 
  • #25
Moonbear
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
11,558
53
icvotria said:
I went, I've edited, I'm embarrassed....
No need to be embarrassed. We all come here to learn, and sometimes we are surprised and it's not just science we learn. :biggrin: (I wasn't even quite sure if you were serious or just trying to be funny.)
 

Related Threads on Help me jazz up my English paper with science vocab!

  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
832
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Last Post
2
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K
M
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
19
Views
2K
Top