Help needed in sign of area element -- how do we take sign

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the sign of the area element in spherical coordinates, particularly in the context of applying Stokes's theorem and the divergence theorem. Participants are examining how to determine the orientation and sign of area elements in relation to vector fields and their integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the rules for determining the sign of area elements in spherical coordinates, particularly in relation to the orientation of surfaces and vector fields. There is a focus on the implications of the right-hand rule and the orientation of surface normals.

Discussion Status

The discussion is exploring various interpretations of the problem, with some participants suggesting that the original poster may be conflating different theorems. There is a mix of perspectives on how to approach the sign of the area element, with some guidance offered regarding the orientation of surface normals.

Contextual Notes

Participants are referencing specific problems and figures, indicating that there may be constraints related to the problem setup and the definitions of the area elements involved. There is mention of needing correct references or scans for more detailed assistance.

core1985
Messages
34
Reaction score
2
Moved from a technical forum, so homework template missing
Hello
I just want to ask that in problem 1.54 why the sign of area element da is negative how do we predict signs in spherical coordinates unit vectors can anybody tell me the rule I have only trouble in sign like in left face it is negative what rule do we use for this negative sign
 

Attachments

  • p1.png
    p1.png
    45.1 KB · Views: 358
  • p2.png
    p2.png
    45.8 KB · Views: 413
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you do not look at the solution to the problem. While in the problem it's about Stokes's theorem, while the solution rather looks like an application of Gauss's theorem.

In Stokes's theorem you map a surface integral of the curl of a vector field to the line integral along its boundary. The surface and the boundary must be oriented positively relative to each other, i.e., such that when using the right-hand rule, when pointing with the fingers of your right hand in the direction of the boundary curve the thumb should point in the direction of the surface-normal element. Then for a vector field ##\vec{V}## you have
$$\int_{A} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot (\vec{\nabla} \times \vec{V})=\int_{\partial A} \mathrm{d} \vec{r} \cdot \vec{V}.$$

In Gauss's theorem you have a volume ##V## is boundary ##\partial V##. The surface normal vectors by definition always point out of the volume you integrate over. Then for a vector field ##\vec{V}## you have
$$\int_{V} \mathrm{d}^3 \vec{r} \vec{\nabla} \cdot \vec{V}=\int_{\partial V} \mathrm{d}^2 \vec{F} \cdot \vec{V}.$$
If you want more detailed answers to the specific problem, please post (with correct references/scans to the problem) in the homework forum!
 
No it is about checking divergence theorem I just want to know that should I consider this in left face of fig 1.48 that it is in theta and r and direction is - phi sue to it is place and here we shall take -y direction and that's why da = -dr r d theta (-ev phi direction)
 
So, it's about problem 1.53? Then you have to point the surface normal vectors out of the volume you integrate over. What I can see from the solution seems to be correct.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K