[Fluid Mechanics] Negative sign on the viscous work term

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the sign convention used in the viscous work term in the context of the differential equation of energy as outlined in White's Fluid Mechanics (7th edition). The negative sign in the viscous work rate equation, represented as $$w_x = -u\tau_{xx} - v\tau_{xy} - w\tau_{xz}$$, indicates the work done by the system on its surroundings, contrasting with the positive sign that would represent work done on the system. The confusion arises from the subtraction of outlet terms from inlet terms, which aligns with the first law of thermodynamics for open systems, emphasizing the net work done by the system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with the first law of thermodynamics
  • Knowledge of stress components in fluid dynamics
  • Experience with control volume analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of the differential equation of energy in fluid mechanics
  • Study the implications of sign conventions in thermodynamic equations
  • Learn about control volume analysis in open systems
  • Examine the role of viscous stresses in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in fluid mechanics, mechanical engineers, and anyone studying thermodynamics who seeks clarity on the application of sign conventions in energy equations.

WeiShan Ng
Messages
36
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


I am revising on the derivation of the differential equation of energy (White's Fluid Mechanics 7th ed) and I'm having trouble understanding the sign convention used in the viscous work term.
1.png

The textbook first define an elemental control volume and list out the inlet viscous work flux and outlet viscous work flux passing through the x faces, y faces and z faces. The rate of work done by viscous stresses equals the product of the stress component, its corresponding velocity component, and the area of the element face.

My confusions:
1. Why is it the viscous work rate has a negative sign on it:
$$w_x = -u\tau_{xx} - v\tau_{xy} - w\tau_{xz}$$
instead of :
$$w_x = u\tau_{xx} + v\tau_{xy} + w\tau_{xz}$$

2. And why do we subtract the outlet terms from the inlet terms instead of the opposite? Since we are finding the net work done by the system, I would think of doing the opposite...

Really appreciated if anyone could clarify my doubt. Thanks!
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation for the rate of doing work as you have written it (with the + sign) is the rate of work being done by the surroundings on the system within the control volume. The equation for the rate of doing work as they have written it (with the - sign) is the rate of work being done by the system in the control volume on its surroundings. The form of the open system version of the first law that they are using calls for the latter.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
12K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K