How does the change in area compare to the differential area element?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the distinction between a differential area element, denoted as ##dA##, and the change in area resulting from displacing the dimensions of a rectangle. Participants explore the mathematical expressions for both concepts and their implications in the context of surface area changes, particularly in relation to the Young-Laplace equation.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the differential area element ##dA## can be expressed as ##dx \, dy##, while the change in area is calculated as ##dA = (x+dx)(y+dy) - xy = xdy + ydx##, suggesting a fundamental difference between the two.
  • Another participant challenges the initial understanding by stating that an area element ##dA## is not equivalent to ##d(xy)##, implying a need for clarification through visual representation.
  • A later reply supports the idea that ##dA## represents an infinitesimal surface area, providing examples of area elements in different coordinate systems, while reiterating the formula for the change in surface area.
  • One participant clarifies that the change in area applies to a rectangular area being stretched rather than translated, which affects the interpretation of the area change.
  • Another participant elaborates on the breakdown of the additional area beyond the original rectangle into three distinct rectangles, aligning with the earlier expressions for ##dA##.
  • A participant acknowledges the clarification and notes that their question arose in the context of the Young-Laplace equation, linking the concepts to a physical scenario involving pressure and volume changes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between the differential area element and the change in area, with some supporting the distinction while others seek clarification. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the precise implications of these concepts.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention neglecting higher-order terms and the implications of stretching versus translating the area, indicating that assumptions about the nature of the area change may affect the conclusions drawn.

member 428835
Hi PF!

Suppose we have a differential area element ##dA##. This can be expressed as ##dx \, dy##. However, a change in area ##dA## seems different. Take positions ##x## and ##y## and displace them by ##dx## and ##dy## respectively. Then the change in area ##dA = (x+dx)(y+dy)-xy = xdy+ydx## (ignoring higher order terms). How is the change of area and the differential element different (clearly they must be, right?). Or is it as I've said: one is the CHANGE in surface area and the other is a DIFFERENTIAL area element?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

Make a drawing to verify that what you think you mean with ##dA## is actually what you write. An area element ##dA## is not the same as ##d(xy)##.
 
BvU said:
Hi,

Make a drawing to verify that what you think you mean with ##dA## is actually what you write. An area element ##dA## is not the same as ##d(xy)##.
Good idea, and I did, and what I'm saying is that ##dA## is an infinitesimal surface area, like something we'd have when integrating a surface. Examples would be ##dx\,dy##, ##r \,dr\,d\theta##, and ##r^2\sin\phi\,d\theta\, d\phi## for Cartesian surface, cylindrical surface normal to ##\hat{z}## and spherical surface normal to ##\hat{r}##.

The change in surface area would be if we had a surface that was perturbed in time, so assume it was displaced some amount ##dx## in ##\hat{x}## and ##dy## in ##\hat{y}##. Then the change in surface area would be ##d(xy) = ydx+xdy## (or how I explained it earlier).

Does this look correct?
 
##d(xy)## would apply to a rectangular area that was stretched from ## (0,0), \ (x,y)\ ## to ## (0,0), \ (x+dx,y+dy)\ ##

If it were displaced from ## (0,0), \ (x,y)\ ## to ## (dx,dy), \ (x+dx,y+dy)\ ## the change in area would be ##0## :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
Consider the following diagram. A = xy is the area of the solid rectangle. A + dA = (x + dx) (y + dy) = xy + x dy + y dx + dx dy is the area of the larger rectangle. So from that we have dA = x dy + y dx + dx dy as you say. But if you look at the extra area beyond the solid rectangle, it can be broken up into three rectangles with areas x dy on the top left, dx dy on the top right and y dx on the right, as given by the equation for dA.

HjWns9Jp8hbJ7K8MsJ-6O1M9PT1bmdx6ETn881k_Gg65JubOdK66zwU8CD0Tq47bZMBiyd4wKHjswUWm9HF=w455-h320-no.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
Thank you both! This was very helpful. I was in fact talking about a stretched area (not translated), and so I am neglecting that triangle, at least until we take the limit as ##dx## and ##dy \to 0##.

In case you're wondering, this questions manifested in the Young-Laplace equation, where a change in pressure times volume is proportional to the change in surface area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K