Help on thevenizing a Scheering Bridge

  • Thread starter Thread starter degs2k4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bridge
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
degs2k4
Messages
72
Reaction score
0
Help on "thevenizing" a Scheering Bridge

Homework Statement



Under the following conditions: C1=C, C2=0, Cx=2C, R2=R3=R, Rx=0, find the magnitude and phase of the sinusoidal current flowing through the galvanometer D (ID) whose internal resistance is neglibly small.

qqswvp.png


The Attempt at a Solution

We have an unbalanced condition. We can determine ID by means of the Thevenin equivalent circuit:

Steps:
1) get Vth:

VTH = VCB = VC - VB = VAC - VAB

(Z1= 1/jwC, Zx=1/jw2C, Z3=Z2=R)

2) Now let's calculate Zth, which will have a real part (resistor) and imaginary part (capacitor)

cum50.png


ZTH = (Z1 || Z2) + (Zx || Z3)

3) Finally let's form the Thevenin equivalent circuit:

2jescqg.png


ID = VTH / ZTH

ok, up to this point I think we have got the magnitude of ID. What about the phase ? Since a capacitor delays voltage 90 degrees, I believe that the phase of ID is 90, but I am not sure...

Would this work as a solution?

Thanks in advance...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


Your method will work. The expressions involved are rather complicated and you will have to be very careful with your algebra to get the final result, which is surprisingly simple.

The phase is not 90 degrees; it depends on the frequency. You will have to derive an expression involving jw: Arctan(Imaginarypart/Realpart)
 


The Electrician said:
Your method will work. The expressions involved are rather complicated and you will have to be very careful with your algebra to get the final result, which is surprisingly simple.

The phase is not 90 degrees; it depends on the frequency. You will have to derive an expression involving jw: Arctan(Imaginarypart/Realpart)

Thanks for your comment! I also thought that the calculations were very complicated...