Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around a problem encountered with a 4.5 m aluminum tube intended for ultra high vacuum (UHV) applications, which has been anodized incorrectly on the internal surface. Participants explore the implications of this anodization on outgassing rates and consider potential chemical methods for stripping the anodized layer while expressing concerns about damaging the surface.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
- Experimental/applied
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses concern that anodization enhances outgassing rates and seeks advice on stripping the coating, mentioning potential chemical treatments like NaOH and sulfuric+chromic acid.
- Another participant suggests that anodization may passivate the surface and reduce outgassing, questioning the need to strip the coating.
- A participant clarifies that the anodization was a mistake, as it was supposed to be external, and expresses certainty that a low-cost treatment was used.
- There is a discussion about the timeline for testing the tube once it is shipped, with one participant indicating they plan to use turbo pumps to assess the situation.
- One participant raises a question about the inner diameter of the tube, which is stated to be 6 cm.
- Another participant notes that outgassing will eventually stop, emphasizing the importance of vacuum and heat in accelerating this process.
- Concerns are raised about the service temperatures for aluminum, with a participant stating they cannot exceed 180°C.
- There is a suggestion to ask the manufacturer to correct the anodization issue before shipping, along with a question about the facilities available for etching such a long tube.
- A participant mentions that sodium hydroxide is commonly used to remove anodized coatings on aluminum.
- One participant indicates they are currently turbo pumping to evaluate the situation.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the implications of anodization for UHV applications, with some suggesting it may be beneficial while others are concerned about its effects on outgassing. There is no consensus on the best approach to address the anodization issue, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the optimal method for treatment.
Contextual Notes
Participants express uncertainty about the effectiveness of various chemical treatments and the potential risks involved in stripping the anodized coating. There are also limitations regarding the assumptions made about the anodization process and the specific conditions of the tube's preparation for UHV use.