MHB Help w/ Awodey Exercise 5, Ch. 1: Functor from Slice Category to Any Category

  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Exercise
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Steve Awodey's book: Category Theory (Second Edition) and am focused on Chapter 1: Categories

I need some help in order to make a meaningful start on Awodey Exercise 5, Chapter 1 Awodey Exercise 5, Chapter 1 reads as follows:
View attachment 8392
I am unable to make a meaningful start on this exercise ... can someone please help me to formulate a solution to the above exercise ...I would like to utilise the exact form of Awodey's definition of functor (see below) in the solution to the exercise ...
Help will be much appreciated ...

Peter=======================================================================================
It may well help readers of the above post to have access to Awodey's definition of a slice category ... so I am providing the same ... as follows:View attachment 8393
View attachment 8394

It may also help readers of the above post to have access to Awodey's definition of a functor ... so I am providing the same ... as follows:
View attachment 8395
View attachment 8396
Hope that helps ...

Peter
 

Attachments

  • Awodey - Exercise 5, Ch 1 ... .png
    Awodey - Exercise 5, Ch 1 ... .png
    4.8 KB · Views: 98
  • Awodey - 1 - Slice Category, Section 1.6, No. 4 ... PART 1.png
    Awodey - 1 - Slice Category, Section 1.6, No. 4 ... PART 1.png
    13.7 KB · Views: 128
  • Awodey - 2 - Slice Category, Section 1.6, No. 4 ... PART 2 ... .png
    Awodey - 2 - Slice Category, Section 1.6, No. 4 ... PART 2 ... .png
    28.7 KB · Views: 124
  • Awodey - 1 -  Definition 1.2 Functor ... ... PART 1 ... .png
    Awodey - 1 - Definition 1.2 Functor ... ... PART 1 ... .png
    5 KB · Views: 132
  • Awodey - 2 -  Definition 1.2 Functor ... ... PART 2 .png
    Awodey - 2 - Definition 1.2 Functor ... ... PART 2 .png
    14.8 KB · Views: 116
Physics news on Phys.org
Given a category $\mathscr{C}$, fix an object $C \in \mathscr{C}$

Define the catergory $\mathscr{C}/C$ as follows:
Objects: the objects of $\mathscr{C}/C$ are the arrows $f:A \rightarrow C$ in $\mathscr{C}$
Arrows: the arrow $a:f \rightarrow g$ in $\mathscr{C}/C$ between two objects $f:A \rightarrow C$ and $g:B \rightarrow C$ in $\mathscr{C}/C$ is an arrow $a:A \rightarrow B$ in $\mathscr{C}$, such that $g \circ a = f$

Define the category $\mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$ as follows:
Objects: the objects of $\mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$ are the arrows of $\mathscr{C}$
Arrows: the arrow $h:f \rightarrow g$ in $\mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$ between two objects $f:A \rightarrow X$ and $g:B \rightarrow Y$ in $\mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$ is a pair $h=(h_1,h_2)$, where $h_1:A \rightarrow B$ and $h_2:X \rightarrow Y$ are arrows in $\mathscr{C}$, such that $h_2 \circ f = g \circ h_1$

Define the forgetful functor $U: \mathscr{C}/C \rightarrow \mathscr{C}$ as follows:
Objects: if $f:A \rightarrow C$ is an object in $\mathscr{C}/C$, define $Uf=A$, which is an object in $\mathscr{C}$
Arrows: if $a:f \rightarrow g$ is an arrow in $\mathscr{C}/C$ between the objects $f:A \rightarrow C$ and $g:B \rightarrow C$ in $\mathscr{C}/C$, define $Ua=a: A \rightarrow B$, which is an arrow in $\mathscr{C}$
Notice that $Ua:Uf \rightarrow Ug$ and show that $U$ a functor $U: \mathscr{C}/C \rightarrow \mathscr{C}$

Define the functor $F: \mathscr{C}/C \rightarrow \mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$ as follows:
Objects: if $f:A \rightarrow C$ is an object in $\mathscr{C}/C$, then $Ff=f:A \rightarrow C$ which is an object in $\mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$
Arrow: if $a:f \rightarrow g$ is an arrow in $\mathscr{C}/C$ between the objects $f:A \rightarrow C$ and $g:B \rightarrow C$ in $\mathscr{C}/C$, i.e., $a:A \rightarrow B$, then $Fa:Ff \rightarrow Fg$ is the arrow $Fa=(a, 1_C)$ in $\mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$ between the objects $Ff= f:A \rightarrow C$ and $Fg= g:B \rightarrow C$ in $\mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$. Notice $g \circ a = f \circ 1_C$.
Show that $F: \mathscr{C}/C \rightarrow \mathscr{C}^{\rightarrow}$ is a functor

Now $dom \circ F(f:A \rightarrow C) = dom(f:A \rightarrow C) = A$
And $U(f:A \rightarrow C) = A$
 
Peter said:
I am unable to make a meaningful start on this exercise ... can someone please help me to formulate a solution to the above exercise ...

Can you see how I approached this problem ?

I should have made diagrams in my solution, but that is very cumbersome in Latex, you should make them when studying this problem.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top