Help w/ review of lab conclusion

  • Thread starter Thread starter NIZBIT
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lab Review
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a college-level Physics I lab focused on projectile motion, where the actual range measured was 2.672m, closely matching the calculated range of 2.68m, resulting in a minimal % difference of 0.23%. The lab aimed to determine the initial speed of a projectile and predict its range based on various parameters. Key factors affecting accuracy included measurement errors, air resistance, and the firing mechanism's consistency. The conclusion emphasizes the complexities of real-world ballistics, highlighting additional considerations such as the Earth's rotation and the Magnus effect.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of projectile motion principles
  • Familiarity with basic calculus concepts
  • Knowledge of measurement techniques using a meter stick
  • Awareness of factors affecting projectile motion, such as air resistance
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore advanced projectile motion equations and their applications
  • Research the effects of air resistance on projectile trajectories
  • Investigate the Magnus effect and its implications in ballistics
  • Learn about the influence of Earth's rotation on long-range projectiles
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics courses, educators teaching projectile motion, and anyone interested in the practical applications of physics in real-world scenarios.

NIZBIT
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
I am in a calculus based college level Physics I class. We're doing a lab on projectile motion. He is a stickler for grading the labs and just wanted to make sure everything is ok. My problem is that my conclusion seems awful short, but all that is asked calculate and measue the range and calculate the % diff.

This labs purpose was to determine the initial speed of a projectile and then use the initial speed to predict the range of a projectile fired at an unknown angle. It is easy to see how England was able to have a dominate navy based on equations used in lab. As long as enough quantities are known, anyone could reasonably make a prediction of a projectile in motion with time, distance in vertical and horizontal ranges, angle, and velocity.

The actual range of our experiment is 2.672m and the calculated range was 2.68m. This gave a % difference of only 0.23%. This is an excellent result given the amount of human error that could be made. If any error was made in calculating the initial velocity the second part of the lab would reflect this error. Some sources of error that could have been made was the length measurements with the meter stick and air resistance was not takin into consideration. The mechanism that fires the projectile gets weaker over time thus maks the firing inconsistent and causes the initial velocity to vary. Rounding errors and improper use of the equations could lead to error as well.​

I just want to know is this a worthy conclusion? Am I missing something? I don't want to make it wordy and full of BS just to make seem like it's a long conclusion.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Real life ballistics is much more complicated than just considering projectile motion. Air resistance have a considerable contribution and needs to be evaluated for different shapes of projectiles. If the range is long one need to take the rotation of the Earth into effect, which is lattitude dependent. Also the deviation depends on the direction of firing due to the rotation of the earth. Wind can deflect a projectile over along range. Another factor is the variation in the value of g over the surface of the Earth that needs to be taken into account. If the projectile spins it will also be deflected due to the Magnus force.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
976
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
27K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K