Hello,(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I know that the CS Lagrangian is a topological invariant, in the sense that it does not depend on the connection we choose. OK, but a TFT is a field theory whose Lagrangian and all other observables do not depend on the metric, a connection in general is not uniquely defined by a metric! Then how can I see CS theory as topological? Another problem, CS Lagrangian is a 3-forme, normally; a Lagrangian must be a scalar!? After that, can I see that CS is topological by showing that the number of constraints is equal to the number of degrees of freedom? If yes HOW! The same for BF! Please help me RANI N’NAGER!!!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# HELP! Why CS is topological? Why BF is topological?

Loading...

Similar Threads - HELP topological topological | Date |
---|---|

A Physical meaning of "exotic smoothness" in (and only in) 4D | Jan 9, 2018 |

B Help me understand Boson stars | Sep 4, 2017 |

A Help with Feynman diagrams involving Majorana Fermions | Dec 17, 2016 |

A Help with a Group for a GUT | Jun 9, 2016 |

Help to find articles with new concepts about Gravity | Nov 24, 2014 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**