Help with a Kinetic/ Potential Energy problem please

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving kinetic and potential energy while pulling a sled up an incline. The scenario describes a 50 kg sled being pulled up an 18.0 m high hill with a 10.0° incline using a force of 127 N at a 45.0° angle. The user initially miscalculated the net force and work done, leading to confusion about the kinetic energy calculation. The correct approach involves calculating the work done by the pulling force and the change in gravitational potential energy to find the remaining kinetic energy at the top of the hill.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with work-energy principles
  • Knowledge of vector components in physics
  • Basic grasp of gravitational potential energy calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of work done by a force at an angle
  • Learn about gravitational potential energy and its calculations
  • Explore the conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Practice solving problems involving forces on inclined planes
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of energy conservation and vector analysis in real-world applications.

Legal
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


You are pulling your sister on a sled to the top of a 18.0 m high, frictionless hill with a 10.0° incline. Your sister and the sled have a total mass of 50.0 kg. You pull the sled, starting from rest, with a constant force of 127 N at an angle of 45.0° to the hill. If you pull from the bottom to the top, what will the speed of the sled be when you reach the top?



Homework Equations


I'm not sure about these, but these are the few I tried to use...only to no avail :(.
1) ▲ X = 18.0 M/ Sin 10 (Hypotenuse = Opposite/ Sin Ө)
2) Force of Gravity on Sled = m*g*Sin 10
3) Total Work = (Force x Cos Ө) ▲ X
4) W = ▲PE + ▲KE
W= mg(▲Y) + ▲KE
Then I figured once I solved for ▲KE, I could use the following to determine Final Velocity:
5) ▲KE= (1/2)m(v^2)
Or simply v = Square Root(2 x ▲KE)/m
Alternate Equation Used:
Total Work Done = ▲KE = (1/2)m*(Final Velocity^2) - (1/2)m*(Initial Velocity)


The Attempt at a Solution



I got my initial displacement to be 104 m using Equation #1. Using Equation #2, I got the Force of Gravity on the Sled to be -85 N. So I Added 127 N + -85 N to get a Net Force of 42 N. I then used Equation 3 and plugged in 42 N * Cos 0 (Because there is no angle between the force and displacement) * 104 m to get roughly 4370 J. Using Equation 4, I calculated the change in Potential Energy to be 8830 J (50kg * 9.81 * 18m). This is where I get stuck because I'm certain there can't be a negative change in Kinetic Energy because it is derived from squaring a number.

I then went back and tried to use the result I derived from Equation 3 (4370 J), and I applied this number to the Alternate Equation I provided. I set 4370 J = ▲KE and tried to solve for Final Velocity. I used 0 m/s for Initial Velocity, essentially dropping the second half of the equation to zero, making 4370 J = (1/2) * mass * (FV^2). Solving for the Final Velocity, I received my answer to be 13.2 m/s. This would be quite a feat for a girl to be pulling a 50 kg sled up an incline that fast.

I know I'm messing up somewhere because I have yet to incorporate the 45 degree angle that the Force of the Tension is being applied from. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Sorry if my explanation was poorly mapped out...I'm still very new to all of these concepts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Legal said:
I got my initial displacement to be 104 m using Equation #1.
Sounds good so far. :approve:
Using Equation #2, I got the Force of Gravity on the Sled to be -85 N.
Also good. :approve:
So I Added 127 N + -85 N to get a Net Force of 42 N.
Oooh, not not so good. :cry:

Both the force pulling the rope, and the force of gravity, are both vectors and need to be treated as such. If you are going to add the vectors together, you need to add their respective components together -- not the overall magnitudes. But I don't recommend adding the vectors together for this problem. There is a much easier way that involves conservation of energy.
I then used Equation 3 and plugged in 42 N * Cos 0 (Because there is no angle between the force and displacement) * 104 m to get roughly 4370 J.
Ugh. Not following you there. :rolleyes: Perhaps a free body diagram would be a good place to start.

Let's forget about the '42 N' figure, since we've already discussed why that's not correct, and go back to the original problem.

There is a 127 N force that is at an angle of 45o with respect to the displacement vector. If you want to find the work done by the pulling force (which you do want to find), you'll need to find the component of that 127 N force that is parallel with the displacement vector.

(Hint: that's one of the first steps to solving this problem: the work done by the pulling force. The second step is calculating the difference in gravitational potential energy [but this can be a completely separate step from the first step -- and actually the order is unimportant since both steps are independent. You could calculated the gravity part first if you wanted to]. Once you have the total work done, and the change in graviational energy, do you know how you would use them together to find the leftover kinetic energy? :wink:)

[Edit: Oh, by the way Legal, welcome to Physics Forums!]
 
Last edited:
Wow! Excellent analysis. I thank you for your assistance and I apologize that it took me so long to do so. I greatly appreciate your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
4K