Help with an integral (substitution method)

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of the square root of the expression \( p x^2 + x^4 \) using the substitution method. Participants explore various steps in the integration process, including factoring, substitution, and handling the absolute value of \( x \). The conversation includes both theoretical aspects and practical challenges related to definite integrals.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Technical explanation
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks help with integrating \( \sqrt{p x^2 + x^4} \) and expresses frustration with their progress.
  • Another participant suggests factoring the integrand and proposes a substitution \( u = p + x^2 \), questioning the implications of this substitution.
  • There is a discussion about treating \( x \) as positive initially and later addressing the sign of \( x \) when back-substituting.
  • Participants calculate the differential for the substitution and derive an expression involving \( u \) and its integral.
  • One participant raises a concern about the continuity of the antiderivative at \( x = 0 \) when calculating a definite integral from \( -1 \) to \( 2 \).
  • There is a suggestion to treat the integral as two improper integrals due to the discontinuity at \( x = 0 \).
  • Another participant questions the feasibility of calculating the definite integral in the \( u \)-form, noting that it does not account for the sign of \( x \).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the steps involved in the substitution method and the need to address the sign of \( x \). However, there is no consensus on the best approach to handle the definite integral, particularly regarding the continuity issue at \( x = 0 \.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights potential limitations in the approach to the definite integral, particularly concerning the continuity of the antiderivative and the implications of using the \( u \)-substitution method.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and individuals interested in calculus, particularly those learning about integration techniques and the challenges of definite integrals involving discontinuities.

fernlund
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hello! I need help to integrate the square root of:

p x2 + x4

by the method of substitution, p is just a constant. I've been trying for a long time but I can't get it right. I know the answer and it still doesn't help. Thanks! (sorry, I don't know the Latex stuff)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would begin by factoring under the radical in the integrand:

$$\int\sqrt{x^2\left(x^2+p\right)}\,dx$$

What do you suppose the next step should be?
 
MarkFL said:
I would begin by factoring under the radical in the integrand:

$$\int\sqrt{x^2\left(x^2+p\right)}\,dx$$

What do you suppose the next step should be?

Thank you so much. Actually, that's about as far as I've gotten. Then I was thinking I should subtitute

u = $$p + x^2 $$

and maybe break out the $$\sqrt{x^2} $$ but that would give me $$\left|x\right|$$ right? Or rather, this is wrong, right?

$$\int x \sqrt{p + x^2} $$

I think I'm missing something obvious.
 
Yes, we would have:

$$\int|x|\sqrt{x^2+p}\,dx$$

I would first treat $x$ as if is is positive, and concern myself with the sign of $x$ at the end. So next we write:

$$\int x\sqrt{x^2+p}\,dx$$

So, using the substitution you suggest:

$$u=x^2+p$$

What differential do we need?
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, we would have:

$$\int|x|\sqrt{x^2+p}\,dx$$

I would first treat $x$ as if is is positive, and concern myself with the sign of $x$ at the end. So next we write:

$$\int x\sqrt{x^2+p}\,dx$$

So, using the substitution you suggest:

$$u=x^2+p$$

What differential do we need?

Well my next step would be

$$\d{u}{x} = 2x$$ and

x = $$\ \d{u}{x} \frac{1}{2}$$

which would lead to

$$\ \frac{1}{2} \int \sqrt{u} du \implies $$

$$\ \frac{1}{3} {u}^{\frac{3}{2}} + C $$

but that's not correct, so I'm still missing something.
 
Yes, I would write:

$$u=x^2+p\,\therefore\,du=2x\,dx$$

and if we write the integral as:

$$\frac{1}{2}\int\sqrt{x^2+p}\cdot2x\,dx$$

then applying the substitution, we get:

$$\frac{1}{2}\int u^{\frac{1}{2}}\,du$$

Now, applying the power rule for integration, we have:

$$\frac{1}{2}\int u^{\frac{1}{2}}\,du=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{u^{\frac{3}{2}}}{\dfrac{3}{2}}\right)+C=\frac{1}{3}u^{\frac{3}{2}}+C$$

So, next we want to back-substitute for $u$, and then multiply by the sign of $x$, which can be written as $$\frac{|x|}{x}$$...what do you get?
 
MarkFL said:
Yes, I would write:

$$u=x^2+p\,\therefore\,du=2x\,dx$$

and if we write the integral as:

$$\frac{1}{2}\int\sqrt{x^2+p}\cdot2x\,dx$$

then applying the substitution, we get:

$$\frac{1}{2}\int u^{\frac{1}{2}}\,du$$

Now, applying the power rule for integration, we have:

$$\frac{1}{2}\int u^{\frac{1}{2}}\,du=\frac{1}{2}\left(\frac{u^{\frac{3}{2}}}{\dfrac{3}{2}}\right)+C=\frac{1}{3}u^{\frac{3}{2}}+C$$

So, next we want to back-substitute for $u$, and then multiply by the sign of $x$, which can be written as $$\frac{|x|}{x}$$...what do you get?

Oh yeah, that's correct! Thank you so much, it was the sign of x that did it. But then I have another question.

Actually, what I want to do is calculate the original, definite integral from x = -1 to = 2 which is a bit problematic since the antiderivate which we just calculated isn't continuous at x = 0.

I could calculate the integral by looking at two intervals, from -1 to 0 and then 0 to 2, and use the limits at x = 0, but shouldn't I be able to do it directly with the u-substitution and changing the interval from [-1,2] to [28,31] (u = x^2 +p)?

If I do that I don't get the right answer.
 
I would integrate in terms of $x$, and treat it as two integrals as you suggest, two improper integrals...
 
MarkFL said:
I would integrate in terms of $x$, and treat it as two integrals as you suggest, two improper integrals...

OK, thank you so much! It really means a lot to me that you took your time :) Is it even possible to calculate it as a definite integral in the u-form?
 
  • #10
fernlund said:
OK, thank you so much! It really means a lot to me that you took your time :) Is it even possible to calculate it as a definite integral in the u-form?

The $u$-form does not consider the sign of $x$...that's why I would use the $x$-form. :D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K