Help with difficult (?) integration

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter lavoisier
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenge of analytically integrating the efficacy parameter (Ieff) in pharmacodynamics for oral drug administration. The user, L, presents the equation for biological response (R) as a function of drug concentration (C) and seeks assistance in computing the integral Ieff,PO, which involves complex expressions with exponential terms. Despite attempts using Maxima and Wolfram's integrator, L has not found a solution and is exploring various mathematical techniques, including change of variables and series solutions, to simplify the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pharmacodynamics and the significance of IC50 and Hill slope (H).
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and techniques for solving complex integrals.
  • Knowledge of drug pharmacokinetics, particularly IV and oral administration models.
  • Experience with mathematical software tools like Maxima and Wolfram Alpha for symbolic computation.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research techniques for solving integrals involving exponential functions in pharmacokinetics.
  • Explore the use of Taylor series for approximating integrals with infinite limits.
  • Investigate numerical integration methods for cases where analytical solutions are not feasible.
  • Learn about transformation techniques in calculus to simplify complex integrals.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, pharmacologists, and researchers in drug development who are dealing with complex integrals in pharmacodynamics and seeking analytical or numerical solutions.

lavoisier
Messages
177
Reaction score
24
Hi everyone,
I am working on a problem related to pharmacodynamics, and I'm stuck with an integral that doesn't seem to have an analytical solution. Thing is, I'm not a mathematician, so maybe there is a solution and I can't see it. I wonder if anyone can please have a look and tell me.

Here's a summary of the problem (long explanation, sorry - I suppose it can be skipped if not considered relevant).
In pharmacodynamics, it is often found that the percentage biological response (R) depends on the concentration of a drug in plasma (C) according to the equation:

R(C)=\frac{C^H} {C^H+IC_{50}^H}

where IC50 is a constant that measures the strength of the drug-target interaction (the smaller, the stronger the interaction) and H is another constant ('Hill slope') that tells you how fast R varies when C gets close to IC50.
As you can see, when C tends to zero, R also tends to zero; for C=IC50, R is exactly 50%, and when C gets very large, R tends to 100%. This is in agreement with the theory that the biological response is proportional to the percentage of target bound to the drug (under the hypothesis of fast binding kinetics, but that's a different problem).

A parameter that can be derived from R is the integrated efficacy Ieff, which is simply the integral of R over time. For a single dose of drug, the integration is from the time of administration t=0 to infinity.

I_{eff} = \int_0^{+\inf} R \, dt

So one must plug in an expression of R as a function of time (right?).
When you administer a drug, the concentration in plasma vs time is determined, in the simplest cases, by differential equations that express the mass balance of drug entering and exiting the body, and being transformed into something else by metabolic processes.
For intravenous (IV) administration, the solution is:

C_{IV}(t)=\frac{D_0} {V} e^{- \frac {CL} {V} t}

where D0 is the administered dose, V ('volume of distribution') tells you how the drug partitions between plasma and the rest of the body and CL ('clearance') tells you how fast the drug is excreted and metabolised (they are all positive constants).
In this case Ieff can be computed exactly. I got (from Maxima) the following result:

I_{eff,IV} = \int_0^{+\inf} R(C_{IV}(t)) \, dt = \int_0^{+\inf} \frac{{\big(\frac{D_0} {V} e^{- \frac {CL} {V} t}\big)}^H} {{\big(\frac{D_0} {V} e^{- \frac {CL} {V} t}\big)}^H+IC_{50}^H} \, dt = \frac {V} {H \, CL} Ln \big[ 1+ \big( \frac {D_0} {IC_{50} \, V} \big) ^H \big]

which is very useful, because one can then study the effect of the various parameters on Ieff.

For oral (PO) administration, C(t) is more complicated:

C_{PO}(t)=\frac{D_0 F} {V} \frac{k_a} {k_a-k}(e^{-k t}-e^{-k_a t})

The new parameters F and ka are positive constants, F ('bioavailability') expressing how much of the administered dose reaches the systemic circulation, and ka ('first-order absorption constant') expressing how fast the drug is absorbed in the gastro-intestinal tract. k is just CL / V.

I tried to plug this expression into R and integrate, but Maxima couldn't handle it. Indefinite integration gave me something with still an integral inside. Even simplifying to H=1 (most common case) didn't help.

I_{eff,PO} = \int_0^{+\inf} R(C_{PO}(t)) \, dt

So the first question is, do you think the above integral Ieff,PO can be calculated analytically?
And if so, what technique would you suggest?

I would have thought that as C contains exponentials, the ratio R should be reducible to a form like:

I_{eff} = \int \frac {f'(t)} {f(t)} \, dt

(with the addition of appropriate constants of course), but I couldn't find a way to achieve that.
I also considered a series solution, but can one use e.g. Taylor to approximate definite integrals (and especially this one with an infinite limit)?

Thanks!
L
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lavoisier said:
I am working on a problem related to pharmacodynamics, and I'm stuck with an integral that doesn't seem to have an analytical solution. Thing is, I'm not a mathematician, so maybe there is a solution and I can't see it. I wonder if anyone can please have a look and tell me.
Hi lavoisier:

I noticed in another thread some references that might be helpful.

Regards,
Buzz
 
Thank you Buzz Bloom.
I tried Wolfram's integrator, and it didn't find a solution (it also said that it probably means there is no formula for it).

I also tried a change of variable in the special case H=1, in particular:

y=e^{- k_a t}

This gave me a ratio of polynomials in y to integrate, let's call it h(y)/g(y), between the transformed limits 0 and 1, but it didn't help.

I tried to rearrange the ratio in order to isolate the term g'(y)/g(y).
I managed to do that, and I also discovered that the integral of g'(y)/g(y) between 0 and 1 is zero.
However, I was still stuck with a term 1/g(y) that I can't integrate.

g(y) = a + b (y^c - y)

It seems that the term a is the problem, because when a is zero a formula does exist.
I guess if I try another change of variable to make a disappear (assuming that's possible) I will get other non-constant terms in dy.

If anyone can please suggest what else to try, even for an approximate solution...

Thanks
L
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K