Calculating GPA: Understanding the Score Scale

  • Thread starter Thread starter Clausius2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gpa Scale
Click For Summary
To convert scores to a GPA on a 4.0 scale, the formula GPA = (4/10) * (Σ(n_i * Q_i) / Σ(n_i)) is proposed, where n represents course credits and Q represents scores from 0 to 10. In the U.S., scores typically range from 0 to 100, and a common conversion method is to divide the percentage by 25 to get the GPA. Some schools use weighted GPAs for honors courses, allowing for scores above 4.0, which can complicate comparisons. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of the conversion, especially when scores vary significantly in difficulty across courses. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of GPA calculations and the importance of understanding different grading systems.
Clausius2
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
1,433
Reaction score
7
The question is I have to convert my scores to GPA system. But first I have to know how you calculate the GPA number over a scale of 4.

I'm figuring it out as:

GPA=\frac{4}{10}\frac{\sum n_i Q_i}{\sum n_i}

where n=credits of the course (here 1 credit=10 hours attended)
Q=score. Here the scores go from 0 to 10, so I have to multiply by 4/10.

Is it correct?

How do you calculate it?

What kind of score scale do you have in USA, I mean, instead of 0 to 10?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Take the % out of 100 that you got in the course and divide it by 25. That should be your GPA out of four. If you have 4/10 that equals 40% for example.

Then I'd take all your courses and if they are worth two credits instead of one just calculate the GPA twice and add both to the total when calculating average - divide by the extra instance.

These are my assumptions. Someone else would be able to more easily tell you. Your way might be correct also but I'm in a rush. If the end result is the same both our methods probably work.
 
Clausius2 said:
The question is I have to convert my scores to GPA system. But first I have to know how you calculate the GPA number over a scale of 4.

I'm figuring it out as:

GPA=\frac{4}{10}\frac{\sum n_i Q_i}{\sum n_i}

where n=credits of the course (here 1 credit=10 hours attended)
Q=score. Here the scores go from 0 to 10, so I have to multiply by 4/10.

Is it correct?

How do you calculate it?

What kind of score scale do you have in USA, I mean, instead of 0 to 10?
I think your conversion is accurate. But, a lot of schools have honors courses where a B in an honors course is equivalent to an A in a regular course (in other words, their max score is 5 instead of 4). Usually, you have a handful of students who have a GPA higher than 4.
 
Thanks Dooga Blackrazor. I'll try it and see what happens.

BobG said:
I think your conversion is accurate. But, a lot of schools have honors courses where a B in an honors course is equivalent to an A in a regular course (in other words, their max score is 5 instead of 4). Usually, you have a handful of students who have a GPA higher than 4.

Thanks BobG. That's true. Here there are courses with equal number of credits, and God knows a high score in one has nothing to do with a high score in other, because they have different difficulty.

Anyway, I'm afraid, I don't know if I'm calculating it right, because the number I obtain is a bit low (I'm not going to say how much low :rolleyes: ). But my scores are above the mean here. So it happens something with the conversion.
 
TL;DR: Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? Hi, I want to learn ultrafast optics and I am interested in condensed matter physics, ie using ultrafast optics in condensed matter systems. However, before I get onto ultrafast optics I need to improve my electrodynamics knowledge. Should I study Jackson or Zangwill for Electrodynamics? My level at the moment is Griffiths. Given my interest in ultrafast optics in condensed matter, I am not sure which book is better suited for me. If...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K