Discussion Overview
The discussion centers around the programming language JOVIAL, with participants seeking resources, books, and information about its current usage and historical context. The conversation includes inquiries about its relevance today, its origins, and comparisons to other programming languages.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant expresses difficulty in finding books or resources on JOVIAL and requests assistance.
- Another participant questions the current relevance of JOVIAL, asking what systems it runs on and which company supports it.
- Some participants provide historical context, noting that JOVIAL stands for "Jules Own Version of Algol" and discussing its perceived obsolescence since around 1965.
- There is mention of Jules Schwartz as a significant figure in the development of JOVIAL, with a note that it was a more practical version of ALGOL used by the military.
- One participant remarks on the continued military use of JOVIAL, suggesting that there may still be resources available within military circles.
- Another participant raises a parallel inquiry about the military's use of Ada, questioning the availability of manuals or resources from the 1960s.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the current status of JOVIAL or the availability of resources. There are multiple viewpoints regarding its relevance and historical significance, with some expressing skepticism about its continued use.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference the historical context of JOVIAL and its relationship to ALGOL, but there are unresolved questions about its current applications and the availability of up-to-date resources.