Help with light, wavelength, and photons

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a student seeking help with questions related to the properties of photons emitted from a Helium-Neon LASER. They specifically inquire about the speed of red photons, the calculation of their wavelength, and a comparison of the speeds of LASER photons with X-ray photons. The student has calculated the wavelength as 6.31424 x 10^-7 m and is uncertain about its accuracy. Forum participants emphasize the importance of showing work to receive guidance and encourage the student to demonstrate their understanding for better assistance. Overall, the focus is on clarifying concepts related to photon energy, speed, and wavelength.
jewilki1
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I need help with parts of this question.
6. The red light emitted from a Helium-Neon LASER has an energy of 3.15 x 10^-19 J.
a. At what speed do "red photons travel? I need help with this one.

B. calculate the wavelength of these photons.
I got 6.31424 x 10^-7m. Is this correct.

c. comment on the speeds of the photons from the LASER versus the X-ray photons. I need help with this one.

I am trying to study for a quiz and really need help.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you show us what you have tried so far (work) and where you are getting stuck, we can point you in a successful direction.
 
I don't know how to do a and c, but I got the answer to b. IS b correct?
and can you help with a and c. Thanks
 
We can't tell you if (b) is correct, unless you show how you got that number.

As for (a) and (c), you have to show some effort. What are your thoughts ?
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top