1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Help with oscillating spring concept?

  1. Dec 1, 2012 #1
    Number1-2.png

    Is it acceleration?

    I found this graph online:

    3bd0c1e6-41bb-4e02-8a67-935333b62d43.gif

    Would the answer be acceleration?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Dec 1, 2012 #2

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Yes, but what's your reasoning?
     
  4. Dec 1, 2012 #3
    Based on the graph: when v = 0, the mass has no kinetic energy, KE = ½mv2. Therefore, all of its energy is in the form of elastic potential energy, PEelastic = ½kx2. When PEelastic is maximum, the restoring force within the spring is also maximized. This results in the mass' acceleration to be maximized as the spring acts to return the mass to its equilibrium position.
     
  5. Dec 1, 2012 #4
    What about this one...number 2:

    Number2-1.png

    τnet = Iα


    α = angular acceleration = v/r
    I = moment of inertia = mr2

    Is the answer center of gravity
     
  6. Dec 1, 2012 #5
    Because I don't think center of gravity has anything to do with it...
     
  7. Dec 1, 2012 #6

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Good. Another way to look at it is in terms of Hooke's law. The restoring force--and thus the acceleration--is maximum when the displacement from equilibrium is maximum.
     
  8. Dec 1, 2012 #7

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    This is what you need. If the net torque is constant, what can you say about alpha?
     
  9. Dec 1, 2012 #8
    With respect to I (moment of inertia) you mean?
     
  10. Dec 1, 2012 #9

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    I think we can safely assume that the moment of inertia of the object is constant.
     
  11. Dec 1, 2012 #10
    So angular acceleration will not be constant but will be changing.
     
  12. Dec 1, 2012 #11

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    How did you determine that? Look back at that equation.
     
  13. Dec 1, 2012 #12
    Oh...

    I'm not sure. I guessed...
    Cause I remember for the Conservation of Angular Momentum concept,

    L = Iω

    If L is to stay constant, then when you increase I, ω decreases. And if you decrease I, ω increases.

    I thought it was a similar concept with this question - the whole inverse relationship.
     
  14. Dec 1, 2012 #13
    Wait so you're saying if the net torque is constant, then BOTH I (moment of inertia) and alpha (angular acceleration) are constant.
     
  15. Dec 1, 2012 #14

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Conservation of angular momentum has nothing to do with this one.

    Imagine if instead of torque, the problem said that there was a constant net force on the object. What would you conclude then?
     
  16. Dec 1, 2012 #15

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Well we can assume that the object doesn't change its moment of inertia (otherwise the problem is silly). The key conclusion is that alpha is constant (and non-zero). And what does that tell you?
     
  17. Dec 1, 2012 #16
    Oh!

    F = ma.... So a constant F means a constant acceleration a. Which means, constant non-zero acceleration.

    Velocity is changing?
     
  18. Dec 1, 2012 #17

    Doc Al

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    Right.
    No, it means that if a = some non-zero value, then velocity is changing.
    Good!
     
  19. Dec 1, 2012 #18
    So the answer is angular velocity...
    :eek:

    Thanks for the clarification!
     
  20. Dec 1, 2012 #19
    I have one more quick question!
     
  21. Dec 1, 2012 #20
    Number3-2.png

    This may be a really obvious question but...
    is it the highest frequency, 740 Hz?
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook