MHB Help with Part (a) & (b) of Question - Appreciate Assistance!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joe20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Assistance
Joe20
Messages
53
Reaction score
1
Hello all, I have done part (a) of the question as attached and am not sure if they are correct. Would appreciate if you can help me to see. Next, I have no idea how I should do part (b). Greatly appreciate! Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180205_151340-min-min.jpg
    IMG_20180205_151340-min-min.jpg
    124.3 KB · Views: 111
  • Q1.png
    Q1.png
    15.9 KB · Views: 105
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Alexis87,

Your argument for part (a) is incorrect. You assumed $O_R = 0$, but it's $1$. First note that $\oplus$ is commutative. Now given $a\in R$, $a\oplus 1 = a + 1 - 1 = a$, and hence $1 = O_R$. The additive inverse of an element $b\in R$ is $2 - b$ since $(2 - b) \oplus b = (2 - b) + b - 1 = 1$. This shows axioms 4 and 5 are satisfied.

To answer part (b), show that $a\odot b = 0_R$ in $R$ implies $a = 0_R$ or $b = 0_R$, i.e., $a\odot b = 1$ implies $a = 1$ or $b = 1$. The equation $a\odot b = 1$ is equivalent to $ab - (a + b) - 2 = 1$, which is equivalent to $ab - (a + b) - 1 = 0$. Factor the left-hand side of the latter equation to deduce $a = 1$ or $b = 1$.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top