Help with Poisson problem in a unit ball.

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Poisson Unit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on solving the Poisson problem in a unit ball, specifically finding the function u(r, θ, φ) that satisfies the equation ∇²u(r, θ, φ) = -ku(r, θ, φ) = f(r) = 1 with the boundary condition u(1, θ, φ) = 0. The user attempts to derive the solution using spherical harmonics expansion and arrives at a result that differs from the book's answer. The correct solution involves the coefficients B_j = (4√π)(-1)^j/(j²π²) and the series u(r, θ, φ) = 2∑_{j=1}^{∞} (-1)^j (sin(jπr)/(j²π²r)), which contrasts with the user's derived series that has j³ in the denominator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations, specifically the Poisson equation.
  • Familiarity with spherical harmonics and their applications in solving boundary value problems.
  • Knowledge of Bessel functions, particularly j_n and their properties.
  • Experience with series convergence and manipulation in mathematical analysis.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of solutions to the Poisson equation in spherical coordinates.
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Bessel functions in physics and engineering.
  • Explore the method of separation of variables in solving partial differential equations.
  • Investigate the convergence criteria for infinite series in mathematical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are solving boundary value problems, particularly those involving the Poisson equation and spherical harmonics.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
I cannot get the answer of the problem as in the book but the book usually right. I did it in 2 totally different ways and I still get my own answer. Can anyone help me double check?

This is to find [itex]u(r,\theta,\phi)[/itex] given:

[tex]\nabla^2 u(r,\theta,\phi) = -k u(r,\theta,\phi) = f(r)=1 \hbox { and boundary condition } u(1,\theta,\phi)=0[/tex]

[tex]u(r,\theta,\phi) = \sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{m=-n}^{n} B_{jnm} \; j_n(\lambda_{n,j}r) \; Y_{nm}(\theta\phi)[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow \nabla^2 u(r,\theta,\phi) = -k u(r,\theta,\phi) = -\lambda^2_{n,j}u(r,\theta,\phi) = \sum_{j=1}^{\infty}\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\sum_{m=-n}^{n} -\lambda^2_{n,j} \; B_{jnm} \; j_n(\lambda_{n,j}r) \; Y_{nm}(\theta,\phi) = 1[/tex](1)

We can just use simple spherical harmonics expansion on (1) where:

[tex]\int_0^1 \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi} j_n^2(\lambda_{nj}r)|Y_{nm}(\theta,\phi)|^2 r^2 sin(\theta) d\theta d\phi dr = \frac{a^3}{2}j^2_{n+1}(\alpha_{(n+\frac{1}{2},j)})[/tex]


(1) [tex]\Rightarrow -\lambda^2_{n,j} \; B_{jnm} \; \frac{a^3}{2}j^2_{n+1}(\alpha_{(n+\frac{1}{2},j)}) = \int_0^1 \int_0^{2\pi} \int_0^{\pi} \; j_n (\lambda_{nj}r) \; \overline{Y}_{nm}(\theta,\phi) \; r^2 \; sin(\theta) \; d\theta \; d\phi \; dr[/tex]

As you can see, only n=m=0 produce non zero coefficients.

[tex]\Rightarrow -\lambda^2_{0,j} \; B_j \; \frac{1}{2}j^2_1(\alpha_{(\frac{1}{2},j)}) = \int_0^1 \; j_n (\lambda_{nj}r) \; r^2 \; dr \; \int_0^{2\pi} \; \frac {1}{2\sqrt{\pi}} \; d\phi \; \int_0^{\pi} P^0_0(cos\theta) \; sin(\theta) \; d\theta[/tex]

Using boundary condition [itex]u(1,\theta,\phi)=0 \Rightarrow \; \lambda_{0,j}= j\pi[/itex]

[tex]B_j = \frac{4\sqrt{\pi} (-1)^j}{j^2\pi^2}[/tex]

[tex]u(r,\theta,\phi) = \sum_{j=1}^{\infty} B_j \; j_0(\lambda_{0,j}r) \; Y_{0,0}(\theta\phi) = 2\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} (-1)^j \; \frac{sin(j\pi r)}{j^3 \pi^3 r}[/tex]

Where:

[tex]j_0(\lambda_{0,j}r) = \frac{sin(j\pi r)}{j \pi r} \hbox { and } Y_{0,0}(\theta\phi) = \frac{1}{2\sqrt{\pi}}[/tex]

But the book's answer is:

[tex]u(r,\theta,\phi) = 2\sum_{j=1}^{\infty} (-1)^j \; \frac{sin(j\pi r)}{j^2 \pi^2 r}[/tex]

I don't know what I did wrong. I did it the other way using spherical harmonics expansion of [itex]f(r)=1[/itex] and then use:

[tex]B_j=\frac{-A_j}{\lambda_{0,j}}[/tex] and get the same result.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone? I gone through this many times and I cannot see anything wrong.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K