Help with Quantum Mechanics and Continuity Equation

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
52 replies · 8K views
Okay so:

[tex]i\hbar\left(\rho i \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\rho(i\phi'i \phi' + i\phi'') + \frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \left( \frac{\rho\rho'\rho'2\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} \right) + \frac{\rho\rho'}{2} i\phi\rho'\right) + V\rho [/tex]

Okay so far?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the third term on the rhs you got an extra rho which wasn't there in your previous steps. Also you can multiply the i s in the first term of the rhs to get -1.
 
Okay,

[tex]i\hbar\left(\rho i \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + \frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\rho(i\phi'i \phi' + i\phi'') + \frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \left( \frac{\rho'\rho'2\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} \right) + \frac{\rho\rho'}{2} i\phi\rho'\right) + V\rho[/tex]

and:

[tex]hbar\left(-\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + i\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\rho(-\phi'^2 + i\phi'') + \frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \left( \frac{\rho'^22\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} \right) + \frac{\rho\rho'}{2} i\phi\rho'\right) + V\rho[/tex]

Does this look better?
 
No, it looks to me that the fourth term on the rhs has one extra rho and one extra rho prime, while the prime on phi has disappeared.
 
Okay:

[tex]hbar\left(-\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + i\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\rho(-\phi'^2 + i\phi'') + \frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \left( \frac{\rho' 2\rho - \rho'^2}{4\rho} \right) + \frac{\rho\rho'}{2} i\phi'\rho'\right) + V\rho[/tex]

Better?
 
no, the fourth term, not the third one.
 
[tex]hbar\left(-\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + i\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\rho(-\phi'^2 + i\phi'') + \frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \left( \frac{\rho'^22\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} \right) + \frac{1}{2} i\phi'\rho'\right) + V\rho [/tex]

?
 
Okay so:

[tex]\hbar\left(-\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + i\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\rho(-\phi'^2 + i\phi'') + \frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \left( \frac{\rho'^22\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} \right) + \frac{1}{2} i\phi'\rho'\right) + V\rho[/tex]

Okay, so what should I do now?
 
What does the question ask you to do?
 
Well, it asks you to split the function up into imaginary and real parts. Have we sorted this out enough to do this now?
 
Yup. Go ahead and split it.
 
Okay, so:

[tex]\hbar\left(-\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + i\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left(\rho(-\phi'^2 + i\phi'') + \frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \left( \frac{\rho'^22\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} \right) + \frac{1}{2} i\phi'\rho'\right) + V\rho[/tex]

Multiply out brackets:

[tex]-\hbar\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + \hbar i\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} =<br /> \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\rho(-\phi'^2 + i\phi'') + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\rho'^22\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{1}{2} i\phi'\rho' + V\rho[/tex]

So should I just out the parts with an i on one side, and the real parts on the other side of the equals sign (ie i f(x) = g(x))?
 
No. If you have a complex equation of the form

f+ ig = p +is where f,g,p,s are real, it follows that f=p and g=s. Here you have to equate the coefficients of the number i on both sides.
 
Okay, so:

[tex]-\hbar\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + \hbar i\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\rho(-\phi'^2 + i\phi'') + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\rho'^22\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{1}{2} i\phi'\rho' + V\rho[/tex]

So if we start on the left side:

[tex]-\hbar\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + \hbar i\frac{1}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}[/tex]

We have:

[tex]-\hbar\rho \frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t} + i\left(\frac{\hbar}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right)[/tex]

Does this look okay?
 
Okay, now for the right side:

[tex]\frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\rho(-\phi'^2 + i\phi'') + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{i\phi'\rho'}{2} + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{\rho'^22\rho - \rho\rho'^2}{4\rho} + \frac{\hbar^2}{2m}\frac{1}{2} i\phi'\rho' + V\rho[/tex]

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2\rho\phi'^2 }{2m} + \frac{\hbar^2\rho i\phi''}{2m} + \frac{i\phi'\rho'\hbar^2}{4m} + \frac{\hbar^2\rho'^22\rho - \hbar^2\rho\rho'^2}{8m\rho} + \frac{\hbar^2 i\phi'\rho' }{4m}+ V\rho[/tex]

Thus:

[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2\rho\phi'^2 }{2m} +\frac{\hbar^2\rho'^22\rho - \hbar^2\rho\rho'^2}{8m\rho}+ V\rho + \frac{\hbar^2\rho i\phi''}{2m} + \frac{i\phi'\rho'\hbar^2}{4m} + \frac{\hbar^2 i\phi'\rho' }{4m}[/tex]


[tex]-\frac{\hbar^2\rho\phi'^2 }{2m} +\frac{\hbar^2\rho'^22\rho - \hbar^2\rho\rho'^2}{8m\rho}+ V\rho + i\left(\frac{\hbar^2\rho \phi''}{2m} + \frac{\phi'\rho'\hbar^2}{4m} + \frac{\hbar^2 \phi'\rho' }{4m} \right)[/tex]

Does this look okay?
 
Absolutely okay. Go on, you're almost there.
 
So now I have to take the imaginary part. Would that be:

[tex]i\left(\frac{\hbar}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = i\left(\frac{\hbar^2\rho \phi''}{2m} + \frac{\phi''\rho''\hbar^2}{4m} + \frac{\hbar^2 \phi''\rho''}{4m} \right)[/tex]
 
So now I need to compare this:

[tex]i\left(\frac{\hbar}{2}\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}\right) = i\left(\frac{\hbar^2\rho \phi''}{2m} + \frac{\phi'\rho''\hbar^2}{4m} + \frac{\hbar^2 \phi''\rho''}{4m} \right)[/tex]

to:

[tex]-\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\rho(x,t) = \frac{\hbar}{m}\rho(x,t)\phi''(x,t) + \frac{\hbar}{m}\rho'(x,t)\phi'(x,t)[/tex]

Well is we

[tex]\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \frac{\hbar\rho \phi''}{m} + \frac{\phi'\rho''\hbar}{2m} + \frac{\hbar \phi''\rho''}{2m}[/tex]

They don't seem to similar...?
 
Oh. Your previous expression was actually incorrect. The last 2 terms in the rhs should have contained single derivatives of both rho and phi, and not double derivativs (compare with the expression prior to that).
 
[tex]\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \frac{\hbar\rho \phi''}{m} + \frac{\phi'\rho'\hbar}{2m} + \frac{\hbar \phi'\rho'}{2m}[/tex]

so,

[tex]\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t} = \frac{\hbar\rho \phi''}{m} + \frac{\phi'\rho'\hbar}{m}[/tex]

Now this does look more similar...