Help with Series: Solving ∞ ∑ (n/2^(n-1)) n=1

  • Thread starter Thread starter djuiceholder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence of the infinite series ∞ ∑ (n/2^(n-1)) from n=1. Participants are exploring various methods to analyze the series and its properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to manipulate the series but expresses confusion about the next steps after simplifying it. Some participants question the goal of the problem, suggesting it may involve determining convergence. Others propose different methods, including telescoping series and derivatives of geometric series.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively sharing insights and methods, with some suggesting specific approaches while others reflect on their experiences with the problem. There is a mix of interpretations and strategies being explored, but no consensus has been reached on a singular method or solution.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication that the original poster has spent considerable time on the problem without arriving at a solution, and some participants have noted the potential for using spreadsheets to approximate the sum.

djuiceholder
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Help with "series"

so I have learned how to do different problems of series.
but there's this problem that I spent hours last night but could not come up with anything.
which is-



∑ n/2^(n-1)
n=1

so from there i was able to take out 2 and end up with: 2 n /(2^n)

i don't know how to do after that. however, i thought about doing (1/2)^n but then again it does not make sense to me.

help needed. i will appreciate that. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org


What are you supposed to do with it? I would assume you are supposed to determine if it converges, but unless you say I can't be sure. Also, please show us an attempt at the problem. Then we can help you with where you get stuck.
 


What an interesting piece of work! I wonder who thought that up. It's hypnotic.
Of course it is easy to find the sum on a spreadsheet . . . approximately, I suppose.
I decided it just HAD to be a telescopic series and played with it for a good long time before I found it. Is that enough of a hint?

I started with the nth term written as the difference 4n over 2^n minus 2n over 2^n and then tried to write the 2nd term in the form of the first term with n replaced by n+1 as is required to collapse a telescopic series. Unfortunately that wasn't quite right and nothing I guessed was either. Finally I resorted to adding x to that first term and subtracting x from the second. To find x, I replaced n with n+1 in the first term and set it equal to the second. It came out very nicely and converges to 4 as the spreadsheet predicted, so I expect it is correct. I'm no mathematician, so this may not be the conventional way of summing this series.

I hope I have not spoiled your fun with this intriguing series!
 


Oh, a nicer way to do it is to guess that the nth term is an+b over 2^n minus a(n+1)+b over 2^(n+1), where a and b are two parameters to be found. This setup guarantees that the series will be telescoping. Set that expression equal to 2n over 2^n and solve for a and b.
 


There's another way to think about it. Can you sum the series 1+x+x^2+x^3+...? Now think what happens if you take the derivative and substitute a special value of x.
 


That's quite a find, Dick! Glad you didn't mention it before I had all that fun finding the telescoping series.
 


It's just the 'standard' way to do it. Glad you had fun!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K