Help with Understanding Conclusions of the Planck Hypothesis

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter The Head
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Planck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the Planck Hypothesis and its implications for understanding blackbody radiation. Key points include the assertion that energy for low frequencies equals kT, which is independent of frequency, and the relationship between average energy and delta E, where small delta E corresponds to low frequencies and large delta E results in near-zero average energy. Additionally, the conversation clarifies that the Sun does not emit blackbody radiation in the traditional sense, as it has a spectrum that contains more complex information than a simple blackbody model would suggest.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Planck's Law and blackbody radiation
  • Familiarity with concepts of energy quantization and delta E
  • Basic knowledge of thermodynamics, specifically the relationship between temperature and energy (kT)
  • Awareness of electromagnetic wave behavior in cavities and surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Planck's Law in detail to grasp the fundamentals of blackbody radiation
  • Explore the concept of energy quantization and its implications in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the spectral characteristics of the Sun and how they differ from ideal blackbody radiation
  • Learn about the behavior of electromagnetic waves in various media, including non-metallic surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying thermodynamics and quantum mechanics, as well as researchers interested in the properties of blackbody radiation and its applications in astrophysics.

The Head
Messages
137
Reaction score
2
Let me start off by saying that I really only have a few weeks experience beyond the introductory physics courses, so I apologize in advance for any gross misconceptions I have. In trying to understand Planck's theory, I came upon a number of confusions that I am having trouble reconciling. Any help on any part is greatly appreciated!

1) The first hangup I have is with energy for low frequencies equal to KT. The way I have read about it is with an artificial blackbody with EM waves inside. I read online that each wave contributes KT to the radiation of the box. Is this the radiation absorbed by each wave? And this is regardless of the frequency of the wave--how so? Now, also Planck talks about the limit as the frequency approaches zero, the average energy approaches KT. I assume this is for the energy radiated, right? If so, is this because any oscillators that are part of the blackbody are simply radiating whatever energy that they absorb because the quantity "hf" is very low and thus easy to absorb?

2) In my text it says that Plank found that average energy is around KT when the adjacent energies delta E is small and that the average energy is about zero when delta E is large. They then show a graph of energy vs energy*probability of the energy level. It is obvious that small delta E corresponds with low frequencies, because the average energy equal KT, where large delta E seems to be for large energies, as the average is zero First of all, I may be confused about what delta E really is. Is this the quantization that Planck described, such as a large delta E is the step between energy levels? But then why is E*P(E) almost zero for large delta E-- shouldn't it depend on the frequency? One last thing, it says that delta E large is such that it is greater than KT-- what does this mean?

3) The setup for this artificial blackbody is that it is a metal cavity with a hole where EM waves can enter escape. I believe that I understand the basic setup and why this necessitates that they must be standing waves, but what about something like the Sun, which isn't made (primarily) out of metal. If it emits blackbody radiation, why don't all the previous arguments go out the door? Because it isn't a hollow metal, I don't see why it should have standing waves, and all the rest that follows.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Head said:
3) The setup for this artificial blackbody is that it is a metal cavity with a hole where EM waves can enter escape. I believe that I understand the basic setup and why this necessitates that they must be standing waves, but what about something like the Sun, which isn't made (primarily) out of metal. If it emits blackbody radiation, why don't all the previous arguments go out the door? Because it isn't a hollow metal, I don't see why it should have standing waves, and all the rest that follows.

Thank you!

The Sun doesn't emit blackbody radiation. Instead it has a spectrum that contains useful information.
 
Concerning 3: One interesting point is that you do not need a cavity (and even in a real cavity, standing waves are not as simple as the derivation assumes) - you get the same absorption/emission on every surface, including the surface of sun (in a good approximation, if you neglect spectral lines).

1+2: Sorry, I do not understand your text at all.
kT is an energy which corresponds to a specific temperature T, this is true for all temperatures and is unrelated to any frequency (of what?).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
793
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 78 ·
3
Replies
78
Views
7K